Finding Average Velocity of Entire Trip

AI Thread Summary
To find the average velocity of a trip where two different velocities are used over the same distance, one cannot simply average the two speeds (A+B)/2 due to differing travel times. The total distance is 2D, but the elapsed time for each segment is D/A and D/B, leading to a more complex calculation for average speed. The average speed is calculated by dividing the total distance by the total time, which is not simply the average of the two speeds. Additionally, since velocity is a vector quantity, the direction of travel must also be considered. Understanding these principles clarifies why the simple averaging method is incorrect.
Bashyboy
Messages
1,419
Reaction score
5
I have been solving these sort of problems, and they follow this basic paradigm: first, they will tell me I traveled a distance D at a velocity of A, then they traveled the same distance D at a velocity of B. Why can't I simply just simply perform the following computation: (A+B)/2. I have been searching the internet for some unequivocal explanation to this sort of problem, but have found no such explanations that suffice in aiding my comprehension in solving these kinds of problem. So, it would be much appreciated if someone would could give me a good explanation of this.

Thank you, in advance.

Edit: I forgot to mention that the velocity A does not equal the velocity B
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Average speed is computed as traveled distance divided into elapse time.
No doubt in your example the total distance is 2D. However the elapsed time is (D/A+D/B).
The first term is the time employed to travel distance D at speed A and the second is the same for B.
Now, if you compute the average speed, won't find (A+B)/2
 
Oh, so the reason why I cannot simply just add the two velocities, and divide by two, is because the time it takes to travel distance D is different with each velocity, meaning the elasped time is different than when I just add them and divide by two?
 
You're right.
 
FWIW, velocity is a vector quantity, so this particular question will also be dependent on the geometric relationship between the start and finishing points.

Whereas the above may be interpreted to be discussing speed rather than velocity.
 
cmb, I actually just sort of made this problem on the spot. I posed the question with the pretense that each velocity were in the same direction, but I certainly see what you are saying.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top