Finding Basis for S in LA: Solution

  • Thread starter Thread starter Haystack
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Basis
Haystack
Messages
7
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Let S = [x y z w] \in R^4 , 2x-y+2z+w=0 and 3x-z-w=0

Find a basis for S.


Homework Equations




The Attempt at a Solution



I started by putting the system into reduced row form:

[2 -1 2 1]
[3 0 -1 -1]

[2 -1 2 1]
[0 3 -8 -5]

[6 0 -2 -2]
[0 3 -8 -5]

[1 0 -1/3 -1/3]
[0 1 -8/3 -5/3]

Now have:

x - 1/3z - 1/3w = 0
y - 8/3z - 5/3w = 0

Letting z = s, and w = t, we get:

x = 1/3s + 1/3t
y = 8/3s + 5/3t
z = s
w = t

And this gives:

s[1/3 8/3 1 0] and t[1/3 5/3 0 1]

Where the basis vectors are:

[1/3 8/3 1 0] and [1/3 5/3 0 1]

and are linearly independent.


Did I do this correctly? I'm really struggling with these concepts and I feel like I'm missing something. Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I didn't check all your arithmetic, but assuming your numbers are OK, yes. That is exactly how to work the problem.
 
Personally, I would prefer this:
2x-y+2z+w=0 and 3x-z-w=0

From the second equation, w= z- 3x
Putting that into the first equation, 2x- y+ 2z+ z- 3x= -x- y+ 3z= 0 so y= 3z- x.
Having solved for y and w in terms of x and z,
[x, y, z, w]= [x, 3z- x, z, z- 3x]= [x, -x. 0, -3x]+ [0, 3z, z, z]= x[1, -1, 0, -3]+ z[0, 3, 1, 1]
so a basis is {[1, -1, 0, -3], [0, 3, 1, 1]} which is essentially what you have, multiplied by 3.
 
Thanks for the replies. Although, I'm not sure I understand your basis HallfofIvy. I can't seem to find how it's related to the one I ended up with. I understand how you got there with the substitution, but is it just another basis for S?
 
It is just your method using basic algebra to solve the equations rather than "row-reduction".

Every member of this subspace is of the form <x, y, z, w> and we must have
2x-y+2z+w=0 and 3x-z-w=0

I just solved for y and w in terms of x and z and then used x and z as multipliers where you solved for x and y and used z and w as multipliers.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top