Finding Charge Using Coulomb's Law

  • Thread starter Thread starter Canadian
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Coulomb's law Law
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around using Coulomb's Law to measure charge with a spring system. A lightweight spring is stretched by a 1.0 g mass, allowing the calculation of the spring constant. The force exerted by two charged beads attached to the spring is then calculated, leading to a query about whether to treat the charges as equal and squared. The resolution clarifies that the charges should indeed be treated as q^2, not 2q. This misunderstanding highlights the importance of correctly applying mathematical principles in physics problems.
Canadian
Messages
24
Reaction score
0
Ahhh, just typed out a big long post and I did something wrong and now it's gone. Oh well. This problem was given on a practice problem sheet in my first year university physics class.


Homework Statement



You have a lightweight spring whose unstretched length is 4.0 cm. You're curious to see if you can use this spring to measure charge. First, you attach one end of the spring to the ceiling and hang a 1.0 g mass from it. This stretches the spring to a length of 5.0 cm. You then attach two small plastic beads to the opposite ends of the spring, lay the spring on a frictionless table, and give each plastic bead the same charge. This stretches the spring to a length of 4.5 cm.

Homework Equations



F = kx, F = K((q1)(q2))/r^2

K = 8.988×109 N m^2 C^-2

The Attempt at a Solution



I will call the two beads q1 and q2.

First: I calculated the spring constant using the information from the hanging mass part of the question.

F = kx
(0.001 kg)(9.81 m/s^2)= k (0.01 m)
0.981 kg/s^2 = k

Second: Using the spring constant from the previous part I calculated the force needed to push the spring apart when the beads are on either end.

F = kx
F = (0.981 kg/s^2)(0.005 m)
F = 0.004905 kgm/s^2

Third: Using the force from above, and using coulombs law calculate the charges. I know that q1 and q2 are equal, q1 =q2 = q

F = K((q1)(q2))/r^2
0.004905 kgm/s^2 = ((8.988×109 Nm^2/C^2)(q1)(q2))/(0.045 m)^2

I am unsure of how to proceed from here, should I treat q1 and q2 as 2*q and solve from there? or not?

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
nice solution, looks good to me. as u mentioned q_1=q_2 =q, so q_1 q_2 = q^2... what more do u need eh ? :smile:
 
Thanks so much, sometimes I amaze myself at my stupidity :redface: . I was trying to treat q*q as 2q instead of q^2.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top