Finding Coefficients for Simple Partial Fraction Formula | Mathematica Help

  • Thread starter Thread starter divB
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Fraction Partial
divB
Messages
85
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I found the following formula:

<br /> \prod_{m=1}^{N_d} \frac{1}{(1-e^{\alpha_{(m)}}z^{-1})^{n_{(m)}}} = \sum_{m=1}^{N_d} \sum_{n=1}^{n_{(m)}} \frac{c_{m,n} }{(1-e^{\alpha_{(m)}}z^{-1})^{n_{(m)}}}<br />

What I want is finding the coefficients c_{m,n}. This looks like a simple partial fraction method.

In fact I am able to find the coefficients in the following form:

\dots = \sum_{m=1}^{N_d} \sum_{n=1}^{n_{(m)}} \frac{c_{m,n} }{(z-e^{\alpha_{(m)}})^{n_{(m)}}}

using the standard partial fraction method. This is also what I get using Apart in Mathematica.

But I need the coefficients for the form described above: Only the denominator should contain z^{-1} and nothing more.

Can anybody tell me how to get this form? Is it possible at all? (it should be because this formula is used in a paper...)

Is there any Mathematica command which produces the desired form?

Thank you very much.

Regards,
divB
 
Physics news on Phys.org
use a change of variables for the exponential and the 1/z, you would be back in the standard form again. Find the partial fractional form and replace the variables.
 
Oh, I am so stupid ... sure, this works!

Thank you very much!
 
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...
Back
Top