Finding current density given B-field

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around finding the current density as a function of distance from the axis in a radially symmetrical parallel stream of electrons, given a magnetic induction that varies with distance. Participants reference Ampere's circuital law to relate the magnetic field and current density, suggesting that the line integral should be calculated using the radial symmetry of the problem. The equation derived from applying the law leads to a relationship between the magnetic field and current density. Ultimately, the current density is expressed as a function of distance, resulting in the equation J = (a+1)br^(a-1). This solution effectively connects the magnetic field to the current density in the context of the problem.
Saitama
Messages
4,244
Reaction score
93

Homework Statement


Find the current density as a function of distance ##r## from the axis of a radially symmetrical parallel stream of electrons if the magnetic induction inside the stream varies as ##B=br^a##, where ##b## and ##a## are positive constants.


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


Honestly, I don't have any idea for this problem. I don't see any equations in my notes which relates the B-field and current density.

Any help is appreciated. Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Pranav-Arora said:
I don't see any equations in my notes which relates the B-field and current density.
No, but I'm sure you have an equation for the field based on the current in a wire. Won't it just be a matter of integrating the density, viewed as many wire elements?
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
haruspex said:
No, but I'm sure you have an equation for the field based on the current in a wire. Won't it just be a matter of integrating the density, viewed as many wire elements?

Ampere's circuital law?

\int \textbf{B}\cdot d\textbf{l} = \mu_o\int \textbf{J} \cdot d\textbf{S}
What should I replace dl with? ##2\pi r##?
 
Pranav-Arora said:
Ampere's circuital law?

\int \textbf{B}\cdot d\textbf{l} = \mu_o\int \textbf{J} \cdot d\textbf{S}
What should I replace dl with? ##2\pi r##?


Because of radial symmetry, the vector B is tangential to the circles around the axis and its magnitude depends only on the distance from the axis. dl=rdθ and yes, the line integral is B(2πr).

ehild
 
ehild said:
Because of radial symmetry, the vector B is tangential to the circles around the axis and its magnitude depends only on the distance from the axis. dl=rdθ and yes, the line integral is B(2πr).

ehild

That gives me
2\pi b r^{a+1}=\mu_o \int \textbf{J} \cdot d\textbf{S}
Is ##dS=2\pi rdr##?

And how am I supposed to solve the above equation? :confused:
 
Pranav-Arora said:
That gives me
2\pi b r^{a+1}=\mu_o \int \textbf{J} \cdot d\textbf{S}
Is ##dS=2\pi rdr##?

And how am I supposed to solve the above equation? :confused:

Plug in the expression for dS. The integral is valid for all r. You get an equation of form f(r)=0r∫g(r')dr'. How do you get g(r)?

ehild
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
ehild said:
Plug in the expression for dS. The integral is valid for all r. You get an equation of form f(r)=0r∫g(r')dr'. How do you get g(r)?

ehild

Thank you ehild! :smile:

I get
br^{a+1}=\int_0^{r}\textbf{J}rdr
Differentiating both the sides,
\Rightarrow (a+1)br^{a}=\textbf{J}r
\Rightarrow \textbf{J}=(a+1)br^{a-1}
 
Back
Top