Finding current using Kirchhoff's circuit rules

Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
3 replies · 3K views
slaufer
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Nt0Cm.png



Homework Equations



Kirchhoff's loop rule and (maybe) Kirchhoff's current law

The Attempt at a Solution



So I attempted to apply Kirchhoff's loop rule to the circuit, and ended up with a system of linear equations:

24 - 6I[itex]_{1}[/itex] - 3I[itex]_{3}[/itex] = 0 [itex]\rightarrow[/itex] 2I[itex]_{1}[/itex] - I[itex]_{3}[/itex] = 8
36 - 6I[itex]_{1}[/itex] - 6I[itex]_{2}[/itex] = 0 [itex]\rightarrow[/itex] I[itex]_{1}[/itex] + I[itex]_{2}[/itex] = 6
12 - 3I[itex]_{3}[/itex] - 6I[itex]_{2}[/itex] = 0 [itex]\rightarrow[/itex] 2I[itex]_{2}[/itex] + I[itex]_{3}[/itex] = 4

but every time I try to solve it, I end up with everything dropping out. I'm not sure what I'm missing here, but I've been banging my head against this one for about 4 hours now, so any help would be appreciated!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
slaufer said:

Homework Statement



Nt0Cm.png

Homework Equations



Kirchhoff's loop rule and (maybe) Kirchhoff's current law

The Attempt at a Solution



So I attempted to apply Kirchhoff's loop rule to the circuit, and ended up with a system of linear equations:

24 - 6I[itex]_{1}[/itex] - 3I[itex]_{3}[/itex] = 0 [itex]\rightarrow[/itex] 2I[itex]_{1}[/itex] - I[itex]_{3}[/itex] = 8 wrong
36 - 6I[itex]_{1}[/itex] - 6I[itex]_{2}[/itex] = 0 [itex]\rightarrow[/itex] I[itex]_{1}[/itex] + I[itex]_{2}[/itex] = 6
12 - 3I[itex]_{3}[/itex] - 6I[itex]_{2}[/itex] = 0 wrong[itex]\rightarrow[/itex] 2I[itex]_{2}[/itex] + I[itex]_{3}[/itex] = 4

but every time I try to solve it, I end up with everything dropping out. I'm not sure what I'm missing here, but I've been banging my head against this one for about 4 hours now, so any help would be appreciated!

Check the signs.
You also have a relation between the currents. (Nodal Law) Use that and two loop equations.

ehild
 
Last edited:
Thanks, that makes more sense now.

I might have eventually realized that my system was cancelling out because it was using mutually derived equations, but I probably never would have realized that I was treating I[itex]_{3}[/itex] as if it were flowing in two directions at once.

Using two of the equations from the original system in the nodal rule equation I[itex]_{1}[/itex] = I[itex]_{2}[/itex]+ I[itex]_{3}[/itex] made it all fall together though. I'm still not sure how I'd figure out what direction I[itex]_{3}[/itex] was flowing in if it weren't given in the problem, but at least I'm FINALLY done with this problem.

tl;dr you are the best, thanks
 
You need not find out the direction of the currents in advance. If you have not chosen the proper direction you would get negative value for the current.

ehild