Finding current using Kirchhoff's circuit rules

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on applying Kirchhoff's circuit rules to solve for current in a circuit. The user initially set up a system of linear equations but struggled with cancellation issues due to incorrect assumptions about current directions. A suggestion to check signs and use nodal analysis helped clarify the problem, leading to a successful resolution. The importance of correctly defining current directions is emphasized, noting that negative values can indicate the opposite flow. Ultimately, the user expressed gratitude for the guidance received in solving the problem.
slaufer
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Nt0Cm.png



Homework Equations



Kirchhoff's loop rule and (maybe) Kirchhoff's current law

The Attempt at a Solution



So I attempted to apply Kirchhoff's loop rule to the circuit, and ended up with a system of linear equations:

24 - 6I_{1} - 3I_{3} = 0 \rightarrow 2I_{1} - I_{3} = 8
36 - 6I_{1} - 6I_{2} = 0 \rightarrow I_{1} + I_{2} = 6
12 - 3I_{3} - 6I_{2} = 0 \rightarrow 2I_{2} + I_{3} = 4

but every time I try to solve it, I end up with everything dropping out. I'm not sure what I'm missing here, but I've been banging my head against this one for about 4 hours now, so any help would be appreciated!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
slaufer said:

Homework Statement



Nt0Cm.png

Homework Equations



Kirchhoff's loop rule and (maybe) Kirchhoff's current law

The Attempt at a Solution



So I attempted to apply Kirchhoff's loop rule to the circuit, and ended up with a system of linear equations:

24 - 6I_{1} - 3I_{3} = 0 \rightarrow 2I_{1} - I_{3} = 8 wrong
36 - 6I_{1} - 6I_{2} = 0 \rightarrow I_{1} + I_{2} = 6
12 - 3I_{3} - 6I_{2} = 0 wrong\rightarrow 2I_{2} + I_{3} = 4

but every time I try to solve it, I end up with everything dropping out. I'm not sure what I'm missing here, but I've been banging my head against this one for about 4 hours now, so any help would be appreciated!

Check the signs.
You also have a relation between the currents. (Nodal Law) Use that and two loop equations.

ehild
 
Last edited:
Thanks, that makes more sense now.

I might have eventually realized that my system was cancelling out because it was using mutually derived equations, but I probably never would have realized that I was treating I_{3} as if it were flowing in two directions at once.

Using two of the equations from the original system in the nodal rule equation I_{1} = I_{2}+ I_{3} made it all fall together though. I'm still not sure how I'd figure out what direction I_{3} was flowing in if it weren't given in the problem, but at least I'm FINALLY done with this problem.

tl;dr you are the best, thanks
 
You need not find out the direction of the currents in advance. If you have not chosen the proper direction you would get negative value for the current.

ehild
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Back
Top