Finding electric potential difference

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the electric potential difference between two parallel plates with a surface charge density of 33.3 nC/m², separated by 14.2 cm. The electric field (E) is derived using the formula E = surface charge density / ε₀, resulting in an electric field of 376.3 N/C. The potential difference (V) is calculated using V = Ed, yielding a value of 106.8 V. The confusion arose from incorrectly applying formulas for point charges instead of using the capacitance of parallel plates, which clarified that the voltage remains constant regardless of the plate area.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electric fields and potential difference
  • Familiarity with the formula for surface charge density
  • Knowledge of capacitance for parallel plate capacitors
  • Basic concepts of electrostatics and charge distribution
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of capacitance for parallel plate capacitors
  • Learn about the relationship between electric field and potential difference in electrostatics
  • Explore the concept of charge density and its implications in electric fields
  • Investigate the effects of varying plate area on capacitance and voltage
USEFUL FOR

Students studying electromagnetism, physics educators, and anyone seeking to understand the principles of electric potential difference in parallel plate configurations.

wendo
Messages
15
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Two parallel plates having charges of equal magnitude but opposite sign are separated by 14.2 cm. Each plate has a surface charge density of 33.3 nC/ m2. A proton is released from rest at the positive plate. Determine the potential difference between the plates.


Homework Equations


E=surface charge density/epsilon knot (8.85X10-12)

V=Ed

The Attempt at a Solution


I tried to relate the electric field equation to voltage difference by V=Ed but this doesn't seem to work. Is there something that I'm missing?

Here are my two approraches:

1st:

Electric field=n/epsilon knot= 3.33x10-9/8.85x10-12
=376.3

V=Ed
=752.6(0.142m)
=106.8C/m

This was wrong so then i tried to find q by solving it from E=kq/r^2
and then using the q to find what potential difference would be through the equation electric potential=kq/r

so from there I got electric potential is 53.43 and since we need to find the difference of voltage i did:

delta v= 53.43- (-53.43)
=106.8 the same thing as before!

What am I missing and what am I doing wrong?? I only have 2 tries left :(
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well, one way to do it would be to assign an arbitrary area to the plates, and solve for the voltage. Then change the area of the plates, and notice that the voltage... does what?

Try this: set the parallel plates to a size of 1m X 1m, so the charge on each plate is 33.3nC. Now you know that Q=CV, and you have an equation that you can use for the capacitance of a parallel plate capacitor in terms of d, A, and epsilon, correct? What voltage do you calculate?

Now try the same thing with the plates twice as big (4x area)...what voltage do you get?
 
wendo said:
1st:

Electric field=n/epsilon knot= 3.33x10-9/8.85x10-12
=376.3

V=Ed
=752.6(0.142m)
=106.8C/m
Looks like you doubled the field from one formula to the next, for some reason.

This was wrong so then i tried to find q by solving it from E=kq/r^2
and then using the q to find what potential difference would be through the equation electric potential=kq/r
Those formulas are for point charges--nothing to do with this problem.
 
Using an arbitrary area worked! THANK YOU SOOOOOO MUCH!
(i'm going to warn you now that i might have a lot of questions today...)

So the voltage will be the same regardless of what the area is, but in order to keep it the same the charge on the plates will change. I see!

I was just really confused at how to be able to find out what the charge was from a charge density without knowing the dimensions, so now I know just to assume a 1m^2 area!

Thank youuu!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
64
Views
5K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K