Finding Equilibrium Force: Is it Correct?

  • Thread starter Thread starter UrbanXrisis
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Equilibrium Force
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the equilibrium force using trigonometric principles. The angle was determined using the tangent function, leading to a calculation of the hypotenuse force, which resulted in approximately 3010.4 N. The calculations are deemed correct, considering the significant figures provided in the problem. The conversation highlights the concept of mechanical advantage, explaining how applying a smaller force at a larger angle can yield a significantly larger resultant force. This demonstrates the principles of force application in mechanical systems effectively.
UrbanXrisis
Messages
1,192
Reaction score
1
the question is http://home.earthlink.net/~urban-xrisis/clip_image002.jpg

so first I found the angle...
tan\theta=\frac{O}{A}=\frac{0.5}{6}
\theta=4.7636416

I then needed to find the force of the hypotnuse...
sin\theta=\frac{O}{H}
H=\frac{250N}{sin4.7636416}

H=3010.3987N

is this correct?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
I didn't bother going through your work, but I got the same answer, 3010.4 N. So I assume it's correct. Also, the distances in your problem were given to 2 significant digits, so realistically the answer is correct to only 2 sig dig.
 
Last edited:
That looks good to me. Assuming all of your calculations are correct, that seems to be the correct method for solving this problem.
 
it just seems amazing that if you applied only 500 Newtons, you will get a resultant force of over 6 times of what you applied.

how can that be?
 
Mechanical advantage. You are applying force against a much larger angle than the force applied against the car. The difference in this angle will result in the force on the car being much greater.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top