Finding existence of zeros of cubic by multiplying y values?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Celestion
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cubic Existence
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on determining the existence of zeros for the cubic function f(x) = Ax^3 - Ax + 1, specifically when A > 0 and A < 3√3 / 2. The key insight is that the function has exactly one zero under these conditions, which is established by analyzing the stationary points at ±1/√3. The worked solution involves multiplying the y-values at these stationary points, leading to the condition f(1/√3) * f(-1/√3) > 0, resulting in the quadratic inequality 1 - 4A² / 27 > 0. This confirms the existence of a single root when A is constrained as specified.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of cubic functions and their properties
  • Knowledge of stationary points and their significance in calculus
  • Familiarity with inequalities and quadratic expressions
  • Basic graphing skills for visualizing function behavior
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of stationary points in polynomial functions
  • Learn about the behavior of cubic functions and their roots
  • Explore the use of inequalities in determining function characteristics
  • Investigate graphing techniques for visualizing cubic functions and their intersections with axes
USEFUL FOR

Students studying calculus, mathematicians analyzing polynomial functions, and educators teaching concepts related to cubic equations and their roots.

Celestion
Messages
34
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I can do the question, but in a different way to the worked solution which I don't understand. So my question is can anyone explain the worked solution which is in point 3 below.

The question was to show there is exactly one zero to the function f(x) = Ax^3 - Ax + 1, with A>0, when A < 3sqrt(3) / 2.

Homework Equations



The part above this asks to find the stationary points, and there are two of them, at + and - 1/sqrt(3).

The Attempt at a Solution



My reasoning was that since A>0, which is the coefficient of x^3 (i.e. the highest degree term), the graph goes up into the top right of the first quadrant as x and y approach positive infinity. And therefore to have only one root, the y value of the stationary point at x = 1/sqrt(3) must be >0. (I also considered the case where the stationary point at 1/sqrt(3) was <0 and the one at -1/sqrt(3) was also <0, but this is impossible given the constant term of +1 and from playing with graphing software, and having A>0). Solving this, i.e. y = f(x) being >0 at x=1/sqrt(3) gives the correct answer of A < 3sqrt(3) / 2 from point 1 above.

HOWEVER, the worked solution calculates the y values at both + and - 1/sqrt(3), and then multiplies the y values together, giving a quadratic in A (i.e. containing A^2), and then uses the condition that the two y values multiplied together must be >0 for there to be only one zero. Which I don't understand at all...

i.e. f(1/sqrt(3)) * f(-1/sqrt(3)) = (1 - 2A/3sqrt(3))(1 + 2A/3sqrt(3)) = 1 - 4A^2 / 27

and when this is >0, i.e. when A < 3sqrt(3)/2, there will be only one zero of f(x).
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Draw a graph, without scale or axes, of a cubic of this sort. It'll come from ##-\infty## at the left, rising but curving downwards, then reach a maximum at ##x=x_1=-\frac1{\sqrt 3}, y=y_1##, curve down, go through an inflexion point at ##x=0##, start curving up, reach a minimum at ##x=x_2=\frac1{\sqrt 3},y=y_2##, then keep curving up towards ##+\infty##.

Now imagine that you can draw the x-axis anywhere on the page. The number of roots is the number of times the axis cuts the curve.

If the x-axis is tangent to the curve at the local maximum point ##(x_1,y_1)##, there are two roots. If it is higher than that, there is only one. If it is tangent to the curve at the local min point ##(x_2,y_2)## there are two roots. If it is lower than that, there is only one. If it is between the heights of the local minimum and the local maximum it cuts the curve three times.

So there is one root iff the x-axis cuts the curve below ##y_2## or above ##y_1##, which is the case iff the signs of ##y_1## and ##y_2## are the same, which is the case iff ##y_1\times y_2>0##.

I think your solution is just as good though.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Celestion
Thanks Andrew, that's great, it makes perfect sense. I think their/your solution is more elegant than mine :) now that I understand it
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K