Finding i(t) without given v(t): Solving for R in a Capacitor Circuit

AI Thread Summary
To find the current i(t) in a capacitor circuit without a given voltage function v(t), it is essential to first determine the voltage across the capacitor, denoted as vc(t). The relationship i = C dv/dt indicates that knowledge of vc(t) is crucial for solving the problem. Participants discuss using node voltage analysis and integrating to find vc(t), with some confusion about the dependent voltage source and the capacitor voltage. Clarifications are made regarding the integration process and the relationship between voltage and current in the circuit. Ultimately, understanding these relationships allows for the calculation of both vc(t) and ic(t).
jofree87
Messages
37
Reaction score
0
Diagram of problem attached below.

I don't know where to begin with this problem. How can I find i(t) if I am not given v(t)?

Since i = C dv/dt , don't I need the function v(t) to solve this problem?

Is it possible to use the function v(t) = v(0) e-t/(RC) , if so, then what would the value of R be?
 

Attachments

  • 0823001228b.jpg
    0823001228b.jpg
    14.7 KB · Views: 785
Physics news on Phys.org
Be a little more clear. I don't know what V you are talking about. From the voltage source you know that v(t)=3*i(t), and the voltage of the capacitor is something you need to find.
 
Mindscrape said:
Be a little more clear. I don't know what V you are talking about. From the voltage source you know that v(t)=3*i(t), and the voltage of the capacitor is something you need to find.

By v(t), I meant the voltage cross the capacitor, I'll just call it vc(t). And I need to find ic(t) which is the current through the capacitor.

I don't think the dependent source and vc(t) are the same since they're not parallel, right?

So I need to find vc(t) to get ic(t). How do I find vc(t)?
 
You're right, the dependent voltage source and the v_c are not the same voltages.

Do you know how to do node voltage analysis, or do you know KCL?
 
Here is my attempt at nodal voltage analysis attached below. Can somebody look it over? My answer doesn't seem right.
 

Attachments

  • 0826001847.jpg
    0826001847.jpg
    16.6 KB · Views: 542
Your node voltage looks great, but then you start doing some funky stuff 3/4 way down the page.

V=I=C\frac{dV}{dt}

so use separation of variables and integrate both sides to get

\frac{1}{C}\int_{t'=0}^{t'=t} dt' = \int_{V(0)}^{V(t)} \frac{dV}{V}

Then you know Vc, and use I=C dVc/dt once again to get I.

Or.. you can find I with chain rule. I=C dVc/dt = C dV/dI dI/dt. Then if Vc = I, then dVc/dI = 1, so you really get the same thing, I=C dI/dt.

You were using both I and V in your integrals, and it doesn't quite work that way.
 
Mindscrape said:
Your node voltage looks great, but then you start doing some funky stuff 3/4 way down the page.

V=I=C\frac{dV}{dt}

so use separation of variables and integrate both sides to get

\frac{1}{C}\int_{t'=0}^{t'=t} dt' = \int_{V(0)}^{V(t)} \frac{dV}{V}

Then you know Vc, and use I=C dVc/dt once again to get I.

Or.. you can find I with chain rule. I=C dVc/dt = C dV/dI dI/dt. Then if Vc = I, then dVc/dI = 1, so you really get the same thing, I=C dI/dt.

You were using both I and V in your integrals, and it doesn't quite work that way.

I think I am starting to get it now, but where did you get V = I in the first integral?

Thanks for helping me out btw
 
Oh, I got the Vc=Ic from the node voltage you did (I also did up to this point to check and it was right). When everything is simplified, we get Vc=Ic. Sorry, I intermittently dropped subscripts, but all the Vs and the Is were the Vs and Is of the capacitor.
 
Back
Top