Finding Instantaneous Acceleration in a Velocity-Time Graph

AI Thread Summary
To find instantaneous velocity at points A and B on a velocity-time graph, you can read the values directly from the graph since it plots velocity against time. However, if you're looking for instantaneous acceleration, it becomes more complex as the acceleration changes instantaneously between constant values at those points. There is no well-defined instantaneous acceleration at A and B due to this abrupt change. Creating a scatter plot of velocity points and fitting a line for average velocity may help in analyzing the data, but it won't resolve the issue of instantaneous acceleration directly at those points. Understanding the distinction between velocity and acceleration is crucial for accurate interpretation.
welai
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
http://i52.tinypic.com/95zrsw.png

^ okay, if my velocity-time graph looks like that (it was a quick sketch), and I need to find the INSTANTANEOUS velocity at point A and point B, how do I do it?

I mean, I understand the slope of the tangent = instantaneous acceleration, but this is not a curve. Thus, I also understand to use the normal straight slope. But I don't understand, WHICH slope is the INSTANTANEOUS acceleration for those points?
 
Physics news on Phys.org


welai said:
http://i52.tinypic.com/95zrsw.png

^ okay, if my velocity-time graph looks like that (it was a quick sketch), and I need to find the INSTANTANEOUS velocity at point A and point B, how do I do it?

I mean, I understand the slope of the tangent = instantaneous acceleration, but this is not a curve. Thus, I also understand to use the normal straight slope. But I don't understand, WHICH slope is the INSTANTANEOUS acceleration for those points?

You read the instantaneous velocities at A and B directly from the graph (because your plot is v vs. t). On the other hand, if you meant to say instantaneous "acceleration" (not velocity), then at A and B there is *no well-defined value*: the acceleration changes instantly from one constant value to another, so the acceleration at one 100 billionth of a second before A is different than the acceleration at one 100 billionth of a second after A.

RGV
 


Ray Vickson said:
You read the instantaneous velocities at A and B directly from the graph (because your plot is v vs. t). On the other hand, if you meant to say instantaneous "acceleration" (not velocity), then at A and B there is *no well-defined value*: the acceleration changes instantly from one constant value to another, so the acceleration at one 100 billionth of a second before A is different than the acceleration at one 100 billionth of a second after A.

RGV

Thank you! Just another simple question, then would it be easier if I make a scatter-plot of my velocity points on my vt graph, then I'll find the line of best fit for average velocity, then find the instantaneous acceleration at the time interval of A and B?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top