How Do You Find Isometries in Relativity?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Flaneuse
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Relativity
Flaneuse
Messages
23
Reaction score
0
This is really more of a general question about the process of solving a certain type of problem than it is an actual problem.

Concerning invariance of the interval, ds, in relativity, say you have an interval ds^2, ℝ(1,3), and a certain equation for a metric space. I know that there are isometries that must exist such that the interval is rendered invariant, and that these are basically the Poincare group of transformations. But how do you find the isometries for a specific space (defined by whatever ds2 is equal to, some combination of dx2, dy2, and dz2), say ds2 = -dx2-dy2-dz2? How exactly do you express these isometries, and the transformations that would constitute invariance of the interval?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Given a metric tensor g, an isometry is associated with each Killing vector field, i.e. a vector field \vec{v} such that:

\mathcal{L}_\vec{v}g=0
(The Lie derivative of the metric along this vector field is 0)
To find these isometries in general, one must in general solve Killing's equation:

\nabla_\mu v_\nu + \nabla_\nu v_\mu=0

You can often find some of these isometries by inspection. If your metric is independent of any coordinate, then translations along that coordinate is an isometry.
 
Is there any way you can find the isometries with just the equation for the metric space though (instead of using a metric tensor)?
 
Hi, I had an exam and I completely messed up a problem. Especially one part which was necessary for the rest of the problem. Basically, I have a wormhole metric: $$(ds)^2 = -(dt)^2 + (dr)^2 + (r^2 + b^2)( (d\theta)^2 + sin^2 \theta (d\phi)^2 )$$ Where ##b=1## with an orbit only in the equatorial plane. We also know from the question that the orbit must satisfy this relationship: $$\varepsilon = \frac{1}{2} (\frac{dr}{d\tau})^2 + V_{eff}(r)$$ Ultimately, I was tasked to find the initial...
The value of H equals ## 10^{3}## in natural units, According to : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_units, ## t \sim 10^{-21} sec = 10^{21} Hz ##, and since ## \text{GeV} \sim 10^{24} \text{Hz } ##, ## GeV \sim 10^{24} \times 10^{-21} = 10^3 ## in natural units. So is this conversion correct? Also in the above formula, can I convert H to that natural units , since it’s a constant, while keeping k in Hz ?

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
5K
Replies
6
Views
334
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
2K
Back
Top