Finding mass of ice, using densities

  • Thread starter Thread starter careless25
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ice Mass
AI Thread Summary
To find the mass of the ice slab supporting a 1250 kg polar bear, the principle of buoyancy must be applied, as the ice is floating at water level. The combined density of the polar bear and the ice does not equal the density of water, as the ice's buoyancy allows it to support the bear while remaining partially submerged. The density of the bear was incorrectly calculated as 105 kg/m3, which is significantly lower than expected. To solve for the mass of the ice slab, an equation based on Archimedes' principle must be established, considering the volume of water displaced by the ice and the bear. Accurate calculations will involve using the known densities of ice and water to derive the mass of the ice.
careless25
Messages
7
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


a polar bear weighing 1250 kg is on a slab of ice. The slab of ice is at water level. The density of the ice is 925 kg/m3 and the water is 1030 kg/m3. Find the mass of the slab of ice


Homework Equations



Density = Mass/Volume

The Attempt at a Solution


SInce the ice is at water level, this means that the density of the polar bear and the ice togeter is equal to the density of water. Using this, solved for the density of the bear (105 kg/m3). Dont know where to go from here... Cant solve for anything else. Just that the bears density is about 10% of the overall density of water.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You know the density of the ice - to get the mass you need the volume.
The ice+bear is floating ... what does that tell you about the volumes (ice+bear vs water displaced)? Can you write that as an equation?
 
105 kg/m^3 is a pretty low density for a polar bear.

You need to write an equation (use Archimedes principle) so that you can determine the mass of the ice slab.
 
OP took ##\rho_{bear}+\rho_{ice}=\rho_{water}## ...
1. you cannot add densities like that
2. the ice+bear is floating with more than neutral buoyancy (the ice is at water level but the bear part is well above it) so the combined density is not going to be equal to that of water.

The relation missing from the list in post #1 is, indeed, the Principle of Archimedes.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top