Calculating Minimum Angular Speed for Michelson's Light Speed Experiment

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the minimum angular speed required for a rotating mirror in Michelson's light speed experiment, with the mirrors positioned 35 km apart. The initial calculation of the time delay, delta t, is correctly identified as 2.33 x 10^-4 seconds. Participants debate whether to divide this time by 8 due to the octagonal setup, leading to confusion about the correct interpretation of angular speed. Ultimately, the correct approach involves understanding the relationship between the time for a full revolution and the calculated time delay. The final answer for the minimum angular speed is confirmed to be 535.79 rev/s.
phys62
Messages
53
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The figure illustrates Michelson's setup for measuring the speed of light with the mirrors placed on Mt. San Antonio and Mt. Wilson in California, which are 35 km apart. Using a value of 3.00 x 108 m/s for the speed of light, find the minimum angular speed (in rev/s) for the rotating mirror.

Link to figure: http://edugen.wiley.com/edugen/courses/crs1507/art/qb/qu/c24/ch24f_12.gif


Homework Equations


delta t = 2d/c


The Attempt at a Solution


delta t = 2(3500)/3x10^8 = 2.33x10^-4

Now if I'm on the right track, then I'm not sure what my next step should be.. I feel like I should be dividing or multiplying by 8 since I was told the object is an octagon. Am I right??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
35 km or 3.5 km?

Doesn't the wheel have to advance 1/8 of a revolution by the time it bounces to see it again in the next successive reflecting surface from when it was originated?
 
Oh, sorry I meant 2(35000)/3x10^8 = 2.333x10^-4

do I then just divide that by 8 to get 2.91x10^-5 ?
 
phys62 said:
Oh, sorry I meant 2(35000)/3x10^8 = 2.333x10^-4

do I then just divide that by 8 to get 2.91x10^-5 ?

You found Δt and that is 1/8 of a rev isn't it?

So how long to make a rev?
 
I took 2.333x10^-4 and multiplied that by 8 to get .0018664 rev/s but that answer is incorrect
 
phys62 said:
I took 2.333x10^-4 and multiplied that by 8 to get .0018664 rev/s but that answer is incorrect

The time for a revolution is not rev/s.
 
Awesome, got it! 535.79. Thanks for the help! :]
 
Back
Top