Finding Null Geodesic Equations for Einstein's Metric in Curved Space

  • Thread starter Thread starter Shadowlass
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Geodesic
Shadowlass
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I'm given the metric for Einstein's universe,
ds2 = c2dt2 - dr2/(1 - kr2) - r2d(theta)2 - r2sin2(theta)d(phi)2
and asked to find the null geodesic equations and show that in the plane theta=\pi/2, the curves satisfy the equation:
(dr/d(phi))2 = r2(1-kr2)(mr2-1)
where m is a constant

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution


I know I have to use "The Integral" (I'm not sure if that's a widely accepted name for it or if not what the real name of it is), and that for finding null geodesic equations I have to set it equal to zero, which gives
0 = gij\stackrel{.}{x}i\stackrel{.}{x}j
where \stackrel{.}{x} = dx/d(mu), or essentially dx/ds, but I'm confused about how to do this, every time I take my work into be looked at, my professor says I'm doing something else and that my work is irrelevant to the question, so I'm stumped. He's told me that I'll also need to use Christoffel symbols to get to the dr/d(phi) form in the second part of the equation, but without the first part of the problem solved I can't do that, so far as I can tell. Can anyone tell me what I'm missing here?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well took me awhile but I got the same answer as they got. It is a lot of messy algebra. You first need to solve for the geodesic equations using:

\frac{d^2 x^{\alpha}}{d\tau^2} - \Gamma^{\alpha}_{\delta \beta}\frac{dx^{\delta}}{d\tau}\frac{dx^{\beta}}{d\tau}=0

That will be the first step. You will then find the constants of motion in 2 of those 3 equations. The next step would be the keyword "null". You need to set ds=0 and solve for

\left(\frac{dr}{d\phi}\right)^2

Then you plug in your constants of motion to get the formula you wrote above.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top