Finding out distance before breaking leg using Hooke's Law

  • Thread starter Thread starter TmrK
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Hooke's law Law
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the maximum distance a man's center of gravity can fall before breaking his thighbone, using Hooke's Law and principles of energy conservation. The maximum force the bone can withstand is 7.0 x 10^4 N, with Young's modulus provided as 9.4 x 10^9 N/m^2. By determining the compression of the bone under this force, the energy stored in the compressed bone can be calculated. This energy is then equated to the potential energy of the falling man, who weighs 60 kg and falls stiff-legged. The calculations illustrate the ease of sustaining a thighbone fracture under such conditions.
TmrK
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
Depending on how you fall, you can break a bone easily. The severity of the break depends on how much energy the bone absorbs in the accident, and to evaluate this let us treat the bone as an ideal spring. The maximum applied force of compression that one man’s thighbone can endure without breaking is 7.0 x104 N. The minimum effective cross-sectional area of the bone is 5 x10-4 m2, its length is 0.57 m, and Young’s modulus is Y=9.4x109 N/m2. The mass of the man is 60 kg. He falls straight down without rotating, strikes the ground stiff-legged on one foot, and comes to a halt without rotating. To see that it is easy to break a thighbone when falling in this fashion, find the maximum distance through which his center of gravity can fall without his breaking a bone.

I assume that somehow the conservation of potential energy comes into play here, as well as Hookes Law.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You know the maximum force the bone can withstand. You know Young's modulus and the dimensions of the bone so calculate the compression that this maximum force would produce.
You should then be able to calculate energy stored in the compressed bone and relate (equate) this to the potential energy of the falling man.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top