Finding Particle Velocities in Center of Mass Calculation

  • Thread starter Thread starter Littlepig
  • Start date Start date
Littlepig
Messages
97
Reaction score
0
hi there.

I'm having some problems with Center Mass calculations... I have a CM moving at x-axis with Vx, and it as a mass of M.

Now, assume CM is made of n particles, but i only know their masses(all equal m), not their speed. My problem is how do i find their velocities? By Energy and momentum conservation,

MV=m\sum^{n}_{i=1}v_{i}
and
MV^{2}=m\sum^{n}_{i=1}v^{2}_{i}
substituting V in second; as M=m*n(Mass of mass center is the sum of the masses of all particles) and simplifying
(\sum^{n}_{i=1}V_{i})^2/n=\sum^{n}_{i=1}v^{2}_{i}

And I'm stuck here. Even if i begin to assume something, like a random velocity of one particle, i can't get a algorithm that have physical meaning for solving this equation in order to v_{i} for every i

Can any1 tell me if there's a solution, or at least a clue about it?

Thanks in advance,
Littlepig
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Littlepig said:
I'm having some problems with Center Mass calculations... I have a CM moving at x-axis with Vx, and it as a mass of M.
You mean: You have a system with total mass M whose CM has a velocity = Vx.

Now, assume CM is made of n particles, but i only know their masses(all equal m), not their speed. My problem is how do i find their velocities?
Not enough information.
By Energy and momentum conservation,

MV=m\sum^{n}_{i=1}v_{i}
This is correct (by definition of CM).
and
MV^{2}=m\sum^{n}_{i=1}v^{2}_{i}
This is not correct.

Simple example: Imagine a gas of particles in a jar. Total momentum = 0, velocity of CM = 0, yet total KE of the particles does not equal zero.
 
Yeah, you are right..xD i must then reformulate my problem...xD

Tk U very much
 
Thread 'Why is there such a difference between the total cross-section data? (simulation vs. experiment)'
Well, I'm simulating a neutron-proton scattering phase shift. The equation that I solve numerically is the Phase function method and is $$ \frac{d}{dr}[\delta_{i+1}] = \frac{2\mu}{\hbar^2}\frac{V(r)}{k^2}\sin(kr + \delta_i)$$ ##\delta_i## is the phase shift for triplet and singlet state, ##\mu## is the reduced mass for neutron-proton, ##k=\sqrt{2\mu E_{cm}/\hbar^2}## is the wave number and ##V(r)## is the potential of interaction like Yukawa, Wood-Saxon, Square well potential, etc. I first...
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
Back
Top