The problem is that phase is a relative measurement. It is the excess radian angle measured with respect to some rotating angular reference. With v1 for example, the phase is [itex]\pi/3[/itex] relative to a cosine angular reference of [itex]500 \pi t[/itex]. A phase angle like this only really contains useful information if the reference is known, which implies a particular t=0. This is not possible in all situations.
For the case of two sinusoids of the same frequency however, the notion of phase is more useful, because in taking the difference of the total angles, the two reference phases (2 pi f t) cancel out (by subtraction) leaving a phase difference which is independent of the exact time origin. This is by far the most useful case for the notion of a phase angle.
For the case of sinusoids of different frequency however the situation is much worse. Not only is a naive calculation of phase difference (as per propose early in this thread) relative to a particular t=0 but each of the phase angles are relative to two completely different speed rotating angular references!
It's like if I was traveling on a bus on a Nth-Sth running highway and my N-S position relative to the front of the bus was -2.4m. My friend is also on a bus on the same highway and his N-S position relative to the front of the bus is -3.6m. So I conclude that the "positional difference" between me and my friend is 1.2m. The only problem is that he is on a different bus traveling at a different speed. How much relevance does my "positional difference" calculation hold?
If you must have a phase difference between the two then it would have to be something like [itex]166.67 \pi t + \frac{2 \pi}{3}[/itex], which is neither constant nor independent of the time origin.