Finding potential using poisson's equation, not a homework problem.

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion centers on solving the scalar electric potential \( V \) using Poisson's equation in a two-dimensional context. The equation is defined as \(\frac{\partial^2 V(x,y)}{\partial x^2}+\frac{\partial^2 V(x,y)}{\partial y^2}=\rho(x,y)\), where \(\rho(x,y)\) represents the charge density function. The user seeks to establish boundary conditions \( a \) and \( b \) for their proposed solution \( V(x,y)=\sum_{m=1}^{\infty} \sum_{n=1}^{\infty} E_{mn} \sin(\frac{m\pi x}{a}) \sin(\frac{n\pi y}{b})\). However, it is clarified that this form does not satisfy Laplace's equation and that the trivial solution \( V(x,y)=0 \) results when the potential vanishes at all four boundaries of the rectangle.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electrostatics and scalar electric potential
  • Familiarity with Poisson's equation and Laplace's equation
  • Knowledge of boundary value problems in partial differential equations
  • Experience with Fourier series and separation of variables technique
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation and applications of Poisson's equation in electrostatics
  • Learn about boundary value problems and their significance in solving partial differential equations
  • Explore the method of separation of variables for solving Laplace's equation
  • Investigate the uniqueness theorem in the context of potential theory
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, particularly those focusing on electrostatics, applied mathematics, and anyone interested in solving partial differential equations related to electric potential.

yungman
Messages
5,741
Reaction score
291
This is not a homework problem. I just want to have a better understanding of scalar electric potential.

In electrostatic, [itex]\; V=-\int_A^B \vec E \cdot \hat{T} dl \;[/itex] where the solution is:

[tex]V=\frac{q}{4\pi \epsilon_0} \frac{1}{B}[/tex]

Where we assume [itex]\; A=\infty[/itex].


At the same time, [itex]\vec E = -\nabla V \Rightarrow \nabla \cdot \nabla \vec E = -\nabla^2 V[/itex].

I want to see whether I can solve V using partial differential equation technique by using:

[tex]V(x,y)=\sum_{m=1}^{\infty} \sum_{n=1}^{\infty} E_{mn} sin(\frac{m\pi}{a}) sin(\frac{n\pi}{b})[/tex]

Where a and b are the boundary condition. My question is how do I set up the boundary condition a and b?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
yungman said:
I want to see whether I can solve V using partial differential equation technique ...
What exactly do you mean by "solve V"? Solve what for V? Your title mentions the Poisson equation which is $$\frac{\partial^2 V(x,y)}{\partial x^2}+\frac{\partial^2 V(x,y)}{\partial y^2}=\rho(x,y)$$To do that, you will need the charge density function ##\rho(x,y)## (I assume this is a 2-D situation) which you do not provide.
If instead you want to solve Laplace's equation,$$\frac{\partial^2 V(x,y)}{\partial x^2}+\frac{\partial^2 V(x,y)}{\partial y^2}=0,$$then you need to do so by separating variables (there are many videos on the internet to show you how), find the most general solution and then apply the boundary conditions of your choice to narrow down the most general solution and figure out the separation constant.

What you have for ##V(x,y)## is not the most general solution. You probably meant to write$$V(x,y)=\sum_{m=1}^{\infty} \sum_{n=1}^{\infty} E_{mn} \sin(\frac{m\pi x}{a}) \sin(\frac{n\pi y}{b}),$$ but ## \sin(\frac{m\pi x}{a}) \sin(\frac{n\pi y}{b})## is not a solution of Laplace's equation as you can verify by direct substitution and neither is a linear combination of such terms. I don't think that your ##V(x,y)## can be of any use. It is a function that vanishes at the rectangular boundaries because ##V(0,y)=V(x,0)=V(a,y)=V(x,b)=0##. Now if the potential vanishes at all four boundaries of the rectangle, the uniqueness theorem says that the solution inside the rectangle is the trivial solution ##V(x,y)=0##.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K