Finding probability of one state in another

rida
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
if we want to find the probability of a wave function let ψ we use <ψ|ψ> when there is no change in wave function. but when we previously have wave function ψ and we quadruple it then wavefunction becomes ψ' the probability is found by |< ψ'|ψ>|^2. why we take square in this case? i can't understand it.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
\left\langle B \:|\: A\right\rangle is the probability amplitude to observe a system initially in state A in state B. To get the actually probability, you need to take the mod squared of the probability amplitude.

P(A is in B) =\left|\left\langle B \:|\: A\right\rangle\right|^{2}

Of course \left\langle A \:|\: A\right\rangle is always 1, since the projection of a normalized vector onto itself is unity. So it just follows that the mod square of 1 is 1.

P(A is in A) =\left|\left\langle A \:|\: A\right\rangle\right|^{2} = \left|1\right|^{2} = 1
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes 1 person
A kind of projection

Think of &lt; \psi^{&#039;}|\psi &gt; as a projection onto a "co-ordinate axis which here is \psi^{&#039;}. Just like with vectors, you can have a vector in 3 dimensions and then project onto some basis like \hat{x}. Here we are in the Hilbert space spanned by the eigenstates of the wave function. We project it onto the state we want, but then to find the probability of being in that state we square it.
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
64
Views
5K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Back
Top