Finding \Psi(x,t) From Schrodinger Equation

puneet.988
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
hi
is there any way we can find \Psi(x,t) for a given \psi(x,0) ?
i got stuck with schrodinger equation...
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
puneet.988 said:
hi
is there any way we can find \Psi(x,t) for a given \psi(x,0) ?
i got stuck with schrodinger equation...

One way is to apply the propagator exp\left\{-\frac{i\hat{H}t}{\hbar}\right\} to the wavefunction. This works for a time-independent Hamiltonian.

Then \Psi\left(x,t\right)=e^{-\frac{i\hat{H}t}{\hbar}}\psi(x,0)

There are more complicated versions that work for time-dependent Hamiltonians.
 
actually I've got this wave function \psi(x,0)=A sin 2\Pix cos \Pix

this wave function is for a one dimensional box of unit length...A is normalization constant

we need to find \Psi(x,t) at a later time t...

how should i go for it?
i tried to normalize it but got stuck...
 
1/ Find the eigenstates of the system (\psi_1(x), \psi_2(x),\ldots)[/tex]<br /> 2/ Write your wavefunction as a sum over these eigenstates (\Psi(x,0) = c_1\psi_1 + \ldots[/tex]. Note: it can very well be your wavefunction is identical to an eigenstate.&lt;br /&gt; 3/ The time evolution of one eigenstate is very simple: it is multiplication with a phase factors. So the time evolution of \psi_1(x) is e^{iE_1t/\hbar} \psi_1(x)&lt;br /&gt; 4/ Just replace each eigenstate by it&amp;#039;s time-dependen version, \psi_1\rightarrow e^{iE_1t/\hbar} \psi_1(x) and you&amp;#039;re done!
 
hi
i want to normalize that wave function but could'nt. can somone help me over this.
i need to find out the value of A.
 
puneet.988 said:
hi
i want to normalize that wave function but could'nt. can somone help me over this.
i need to find out the value of A.

psi(x,0)=A sin 2x cos x
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top