Finding Roots of Complex Polynomials: General Formula and Exponential Form

complexhuman
Messages
22
Reaction score
0
Hi all

Jut had a question. How do I go about finding the general formula for roots of the complex poly {z}^{n}-a where a is another complex number.

Do I just go {z}^{n}=a? :S so complicated this things!

Thanks in advance!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
complexhuman said:
Hi all

Jut had a question. How do I go about finding the general formula for roots of the complex poly {z}^{n}-a where a is another complex number.

Do I just go {z}^{n}=a? :S so complicated this things!

Thanks in advance!
It is easier if z is written in geometric form
let a=u+i v where u and v are real
z=r(cos(t)+i sin(t)) where 0<=r
then
z^n-a becomes
(r^n)(cos(n t)+i sin(n t))-a
so r should be chosen by
r^n=|a|=sqrt(a^2+b^2)
cos(n t)+i sin(n t)=a/|a|
so
cos(n t)=u/|a|
sin(n t)=v/|a|
tan(n t)=v/u
t=(1/n)Arctan(v/u)
this is one solution but n can be found using the usual methods of solving trigonometric equations.
in fact
t=(1/n)Arctan(v/u)+2pi k/n
k=0,1,2,...,n-2,n-1,
thus
z=r(cos(t)+i sin(t))
=|a|^(1/n)(cos((1/n)Arctan(v/u)+2pi k/n)+i sin((1/n)Arctan(v/u)+2pi k/n
))
k=0,1,2,...,n-2,n-1
 
Last edited:
It's actually easiest to understand in polar co-ordinates. a = |a|\exp (i\theta ). So simply take |z| to be |a|1/n. Take angles \theta _k = \frac{\theta + 2k\pi}{n} for values k = 0, 1, ..., n-1. Then your roots are the complex numbers |z|\exp (i\theta _k) for the n values for k.
 
Last edited:
Since ei&theta;= cos(&theta;)+ i sin(&theta;), AKG and lurflurf are saying exactly the same thing!
 
We're saying very different things. lurflurf is saying that it's easiest to see it in geometric form, I'm saying it's easiest to see it in polar form.
 
Writing a+ bi as r(cos(θ)+ i sin(θ)) is writing the complex number in polar form.
 
Oops, my mistake. Then whatever form my post was in is easier to understand. What would it be called? Exponential form? Euler form?
 
"Exponential" form would do. Engineering texts talk about "Cis &theta;" which is shorthand for "cos(&theta;)+ i sin(&theta;)" but, yes, exponential form is a lot simpler (though more sophisticated) than "cis".
 

Similar threads

Back
Top