Finding Stationary Points in a Rational Function

  • Thread starter Thread starter HeyHow!
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
To find stationary points in the function f(x) = 1/(x+3) + 1/(x-1), the first derivative f'(x) = -1/(x+3)^2 -1/(x-1)^2 was calculated. The resulting equation 2x^2 + 4x + 5 = 0 has no real solutions, indicating that the function does not have stationary points. The function is always decreasing across its defined intervals: (-∞, -3), (-3, 1), and (1, ∞). The discussion clarified that the derivative's behavior does not imply stationary points, reinforcing that the function is consistently decreasing.
HeyHow!
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
i have been give the equation

f(x) = 1/(x+3) + 1/(x-1)

i am trying to find the stationary points. so

f '(x) = -1/(x+3)^2 -1/(x-1)^2

f '(x) = 0 for stationary point

then when i simplified down i get 2x^2+4x+5 = 0, which is undefinable

i looked at the derivative on the graph and it looks like it has a turning point at (-1,0).

please help, either i have made an easy mistake or somethings wrong! :cry:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yeah, looks like the derivative has a "turning point" around x = -1. However, that doesn't mean that the derivative IS zero at that point, it means that the derivative of the derivative is zero there. If you wanted to x such that f'(x) = 0, you'd look for the places where f'(x) crosses the x-axis (which, in this case, it doesn't appear to do).
 
Shouldn't it be 2x^2 + 4x + 10 =0. this has no real solution so the function is always increasing.

You got to look at the second derivative (f'') of this function and solve f'' = 0. Then you will get the x-coördinate of the turning point. Substituting this x-value into f(x) yields the y-value.


regards
marlon
 
marlon:
The function is always decreasing, not increasing!
The function doesn't have any stationary points.
The function has three continuous sections , each of them decreasing; the intervals where the function is defined are:
-\infty<{x}<{-3},-3<{x}<{1},1<x<\infty
 
arildno said:
marlon:
The function is always decreasing, not increasing!

yes that is correct. Forgot the minus sign in the first derivative...

Thanks for the correction.

regards
marlon
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top