MHB Finding the acceleration of a soldier dropeed into a snow bank

  • Thread starter Thread starter leprofece
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Acceleration
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the acceleration of a soldier dropped from an airplane into a snowbank. The soldier falls from a height of 20 meters, reaching a speed of 20 m/s just before impact due to gravitational potential energy conversion. Upon sinking 2.4 meters into the snow, one participant calculates the deceleration to be approximately 83.33 m/s², while another suggests a different value of 117.85 m/s². The horizontal speed of 72 km/h is deemed irrelevant to the calculation of vertical acceleration. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding both vertical and horizontal components of motion in physics.
leprofece
Messages
239
Reaction score
0
During the second world war, the Russians left his troops on the banks of snow falling from airplanes
low speed and flight flush, without the use of parachutes. Suppose that a soldier is dropped from an airplane traveling horizontally at a speed of 72 km/h at an altitude of 20m above a deep snow Bank. The soldier sinks to a depth of 2, 40m in the snow before stopping. What is the magnitude of the acceleration of the soldier while holding his movement in the snow?
Biook Answer a = 117; 85 m/s.

A FRIEND ANSWER:
you have to take into account that the soldier is released from 20 meters, so just before reaching the ground we can calculate its speed using conservation of mechanical energy: initial potential energy while falling soldier, you are turning into kinetic energy. EP = Ec--> m * g * h = 1/2 * v 2 * m--> v 2 = 2 * g * h = 2.10 * 20 = 400--> v = 20 m/s
Now we know that it has traveled a distance vertically from 2.4 m, so Vf'2 - Vi ^ 2 = 2 * to * s--> 0 - 20 ^ 2 = 2 *(-10*2.4-> a = 83.33 m/s^2)
Note that extra information, the horizontal speed, that has no influence in what we know
To him the speed was not used in his solving

Who has the reason?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Re: Who stands the reason?

leprofece said:
During the second world war, the Russians left his troops on the banks of snow falling from airplanes
low speed and flight flush, without the use of parachutes. Suppose that a soldier is dropped from an airplane traveling horizontally at a speed of 72 km/h at an altitude of 20m above a deep snow Bank. The soldier sinks to a depth of 2, 40m in the snow before stopping. What is the magnitude of the acceleration of the soldier while holding his movement in the snow?
Biook Answer a = 117; 85 m/s.

A FRIEND ANSWER:
you have to take into account that the soldier is released from 20 meters, so just before reaching the ground we can calculate its speed using conservation of mechanical energy: initial potential energy while falling soldier, you are turning into kinetic energy. EP = Ec--> m * g * h = 1/2 * v 2 * m--> v 2 = 2 * g * h = 2.10 * 20 = 400--> v = 20 m/s
Now we know that it has traveled a distance vertically from 2.4 m, so Vf'2 - Vi ^ 2 = 2 * to * s--> 0 - 20 ^ 2 = 2 *(-10*2.4-> a = 83.33 m/s^2)
Note that extra information, the horizontal speed, that has no influence in what we know
To him the speed was not used in his solving

Who has the reason?
You can use the given depth, 2.4 m, to determine the time it takes to stop. But the acceleration is a vector quantity. You can determine the horizontal component of acceleration from the time to come to a stop.
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Back
Top