jmtome2
- 67
- 0
Homework Statement
Show that the conditions for a bound state, Eqn1 and Eqn2, can be obtained by requiring the vanquishing of the denominators in Eqn3 at k=i\kappa. Can you give the argument for why this is not an accident?
Homework Equations
Eqn1: \alpha=q*tan(qa)
Eqn2: \alpha=-q*cot(qa)
Eqn3:
R= i*e^{-2ika}\frac{(q^{2}-k^{2})*sin(2qa)}{2kq*cos(2qa)-i(q^{2}+k^{2})*sin2qa}
T=e^{-2ika}\frac{2kq}{2kq*cos(2qa)-i(q^{2}+k^{2})*sin2qa}
The problem concerns a potential well of V_{0} from -a to a.
I believe that k^{2}=\frac{2mE}{h(bar)^{2}} and that \kappa^{2}=-\frac{2m(E-V_{0})}{h(bar)^{2}}
I also know that in order to reach these boundaries through another method in the book, they let -\alpha^{2}=\frac{2mE}{h(bar)^{2}}...
The Attempt at a Solution
I removed the demoninators from Eqn3 and tried to substitute k=\sqrt{\frac{2mE}{h(bar)^{2}}} into Eqn3... but not only was this result messy but I couldn't get the boundary conditions, Eqn1 and Eqn2 to come out. Help?
Last edited: