Finding the Central Force Given the Orbit

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on deriving the central force from the equations of motion in polar coordinates. The user initially attempts to express variables in terms of radius (r) but struggles with eliminating angular components. A key suggestion involves differentiating the equations to relate angular and radial accelerations, leading to expressions for r double dot and theta dot. The conversation highlights the importance of maintaining consistent units throughout the calculations, as errors in differentiation and algebra can lead to incorrect results. Ultimately, the user seeks clarification and guidance on achieving the correct expression for the central force.
phil ess
Messages
67
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



W6ozH.jpg


Homework Equations



on image

The Attempt at a Solution



The first thing I did was use the second equation to get

Theta dot = L/mr2

Which I then subbed into the first equation to eliminate Theta dot.

Now I need everything in terms of r, and this is where I get stuck.

If I just find the second derivative of r (r double dot), then sub it back in, I am left with all kinds of Thetas, but I need f as a function of r.

How do I proceed here? Any help is greatly appreciated! Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Derive the second equation: from that you get the second derivative of theta in terms of r and the first derivatives of both r and theta.
The first derivative of theta is just L/(mr^2).
And you have the equation of the orbit to find theta in terms of r.

ehild
 
Thanks for the reply! But I am not sure what youre getting at.

When you say derive the second equation, I assume you mean differentiate it?

In that case, is this correct?

\dot{\theta} = L / mr\stackrel{2}{}

\ddot{\theta} = -2L\dot{r} / mr\stackrel{3}{}

Im a little unsure as to how to do the derivative..

In any case, I don't see how this helps me, since the equation for the force doesn't contain any Theta double dot terms.


What I then tried to do was just find r double dot frm the equation for r, and using the equation for r, cancel out the thetas that appear.

Then i get:

\ddot{r} = \frac{-A}{r\stackrel{2}{}}\left(1-\frac{r\stackrel{2}{}}{A\stackrel{4}{}}\right)\stackrel{-1/2}{}

Which is a nice enough result I guess, and now I have r double dot and theta dot to use in equation 1, but I get a very wrong answer upon subbing them in..

If you can offer any more guidance I'd be very grateful!
 
I can not check your work if you do not show it in detail. Do you know what result you should get?

This is quite a weird orbit as it has sense only between -pi/4 and pi/4, otherwise r^2 would be negative.

Anyway, the derivation for a central force
is a bit easier if you use the derivatives of r with respect to theta, (r', r''):

\dot r = r' \dot \theta

and

\ddot r = r'' \dot \theta^2+r' \ddot \theta

As you derived already

<br /> \ddot{\theta} =\frac {-2L\dot r} {mr^3}<br />

this is equivalent to

<br /> \ddot{\theta} =\frac {-2L r&#039; \dot \theta} {mr^3}=-\frac{2 r&#039;}{r} \dot \theta^2<br />

therefore

\ddot r = r&#039;&#039; \dot \theta^2- \frac{2 r&#039;^2}{r} \dot \theta^2\rightarrow \ddot r =(r&#039;&#039;-\frac{2r&#039;^2}{r})\dot \theta^2

and

f/m= (r&#039;&#039;-\frac{2r&#039;^2}{r}-r)\dot \theta^2

If you substitute r=1/y, you get an even simpler formula for y:

f= -(y&#039;&#039;+y)r^2 m \dot \theta^2=-(y&#039;&#039;+y) L^2/(mr^2)

Not long ago, there was a thread with similar topics: https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=392282

ehild
 
Last edited:
Thanks so much for the help... this is really frustrating. Maybe I'm just making arithmetic errors, bu I just can't get the right answer. Using your method:

r=A cos^{1/2}(2\theta)

r&#039;=A cos^{-1/2}(2\theta)sin(2\theta)

r&#039;^{2}=A^{2}cos^{-1}(2\theta)sin^{2}(2\theta) = A^{2}cos^{-1}(2\theta)(1-cos^{2}(2\theta)) = \frac{A^{4}}{r^{3}} - r

after substituting back in from the first line to get rid of theta

r&quot; = \frac{1}{2}A cos^{-3/2}(2\theta)(-2sin(2\theta))sin(2\theta) - A cos^{1/2}(2\theta)(2 cos(2\theta))

Then after a few lines of simplifying, just like for r'

r&quot; = \frac{-A^{4}}{r^{4}}+1-2r

Subbing into your equation for r double dot:

\ddot{r}=\frac{-LA^{4}}{mr^{6}}(1+r)

Which gives

f(r) = \frac{-LA^{4}(1+r)-L^{2}r^{3}}{mr^{6}}

which again is wrong. the correct answer should be

f(r) = \frac{-3A^{4}L^{2}}{mr^{7}}
 
phil ess said:
Maybe I'm just making arithmetic errors
You are.

r&#039;^{2}=A^{2}cos^{-1}(2\theta)sin^{2}(2\theta) = A^{2}cos^{-1}(2\theta)(1-cos^{2}(2\theta)) = \frac{A^{4}}{r^{3}} - r
A quick test of the units shows this cannot be correct. r' is the derivative of r (units=length) with respect to angle (unitless). r' therefore has units of length, so r'2 has units of length2. Your result has units of length, so it cannot be correct. This invalid result makes everything else you did invalid.

Try differentiating r^2 = A^2\cos2\theta to give you rr&#039;. What does squaring that result yield?
 
I have found some errors at the beginning. The following is correct.

<br /> r&#039;=-A cos^{-1/2}(2\theta)sin(2\theta)<br />

<br /> r&#039;^{2}=A^{2}cos^{-1}(2\theta)sin^{2}(2\theta) = A^{2}cos^{-1}(2\theta)(1-cos^{2}(2\theta)) = \frac{A^{4}}{r^{2}} - r^2<br />

ehild
 
Back
Top