Finding the Constant k in an Exponential Function with Limited Information

dragonblood
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
I have a problem with an exponential function. I am wondering if an exact solution is possible, or if I have to write the solution as a logarithm of an unknown.

A formula says that E(z)=E(0)^{-kz}, where E is light intensity and z is depth in water. My objective is to find the constant k. I also know that E(3)=0.01E(0).

I have tried to solve for k in the following way:

E(3)=0.01E(0)

E(3)=100E(3)^{-3k}
\ln |0.01E(3)|=-3k \ln|E(3)|

I realize that all values except for k is a constant, however, I do not know the value of E, and my question is: Are there any ways to eliminate E(3) from the equation, leaving k=numerical constant?

-dragonblood
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
dragonblood said:
I have a problem with an exponential function. I am wondering if an exact solution is possible, or if I have to write the solution as a logarithm of an unknown.

A formula says that E(z)=E(0)^{-kz}, where E is light intensity and z is depth in water. My objective is to find the constant k. I also know that E(3)=0.01E(0).

I have tried to solve for k in the following way:

E(3)=0.01E(0)

E(3)=100E(3)^{-3k}
\ln |0.01E(3)|=-3k \ln|E(3)|

I realize that all values except for k is a constant, however, I do not know the value of E, and my question is: Are there any ways to eliminate E(3) from the equation, leaving k=numerical constant?

-dragonblood

The formula you have is Beer's law, and E(z) is the intensity of light at a given depth. E0 is the input intensity, or intensity at depth 0.

In your post, you have omitted the all important "e". The relation would normally be given as follows:

E(z) = E_0 e^{-kz}​

You should be able to solve this for k, given E(3) = 0.01 E(0).

Cheers -- sylas
 
Thanks!
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top