Finding the Distance for Static Equilibrium of a Suspended Rod

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the distance for static equilibrium of a uniform rod with a mass of 0.122 kg and a length of 0.90 m, supporting two additional masses of 0.20 kg and 0.50 kg. The correct distance x for the 0.20 kg mass to achieve static equilibrium is determined to be 0.503 m. The torque equations used include the weight of the rod, which is treated as concentrated at its midpoint due to its uniform density. The final torque balance confirms that the system is in static equilibrium when the calculated torques are equal.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of torque calculations in physics
  • Familiarity with static equilibrium concepts
  • Knowledge of uniform density and its implications on mass distribution
  • Basic skills in algebra for solving equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of torque and static equilibrium in greater detail
  • Learn about the effects of mass distribution on torque calculations
  • Explore the concept of center of mass in uniform objects
  • Practice solving similar problems involving multiple masses and rods
USEFUL FOR

Students in physics, educators teaching mechanics, and anyone interested in understanding the principles of static equilibrium and torque calculations.

flash2
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
A uniform .122kg rod of .90 m length is used to suspend two masses as shown below. At what distance x should the .20kg mass be place to achieve static equilibrium?

physics_torque2.jpg



Okay so I got the Torque of the 0.2kg mass

T= (0.2)(9.8)(x) with x being the length I hafta find.

Then I got the Torque of the 0.50kg mass

T= (0.5)(9.8)(0.2)

Then I plugged it into this...

sum of Torques CW= Sum of Torques CCW and the answer was 0.5m and I got that but originally for the 0.50 mass, I put in (0.25) for the length because that's what it is but I didn't get the answer so I did trial and error with the numbers I had and I figured 0.2m was the right length to get the right answer. So I'm wondering why it's 0.2 m and if the mass of the rod matters.. cause I dind't use it.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well the answer I'm arriving at is .503 meters, or just .5 if you want to keep it simple. When they give you mass of the rod, that usually means it matters, and they make it simple when they tell you it's uniform. Since the mass-density is uniform you can assume that the rod applies all it's weight as though it were concentrated at the length of the rod divided by two, or .45. Since .45 is to the left of the support point, you can say the rod applies a torque of (.122*9.81*.2)

So the equation becomes (.2*9.81*x) + (.122*9.81*.2) = (.5*9.81*.25)
Solving for x yields .986886/(.2*9.81) = .503

When we plug this value into our original summation of torques equation we arrive at 1.22625 = 1.22625 so the bar must now be in static equilibrium.
 
The mass of the bar matters because even without the weights the bar will tilt in the direction of the longer side.
 
Oh man I get it so much more now. So is there a torque from the rod exerted on the right side of the balance too? Or does taht even matter?

I know this is prbly really easy but it's extremely hard when your teacher doesn't teach the lesson.

Thanks!

-f
 
flash2 said:
Oh man I get it so much more now. So is there a torque from the rod exerted on the right side of the balance too? Or does taht even matter?

I know this is prbly really easy but it's extremely hard when your teacher doesn't teach the lesson.

Thanks!

-f
You only need on torque from the rod. You may take all the mass of the rod as if it were located at the center of the rod (assuming the rod has uniform density).
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
5K
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
Replies
9
Views
3K