Finding the Exact Values of sinx and cosx in Trigonometric Equations

  • Thread starter Thread starter glass.shards
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Trigonometry
glass.shards
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
If tan2x=(-24/7), find the exact value(s) of sinx and cosx


Working out the answers by hand, I get

sinx = ±3/5, ±4/5
cosx = ±3/5, ±4/5


But by actually calculating x and plugging it into sinx and cosx, I get

sinx = 3/5, 4/5
cosx = 3/5, -4/5


I'm pretty sure that the latter are the answers, but how do I justify it given the ±?

Thanks! :smile:
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Here's what I did:

tan2x = -24/7

so to find cosx and sinx, I established that on a graph:
y = -24
x = 7
r = 25

OR

y = 24
x = -7
r = 25

Thus, cos2x = ±7/25. By breaking down cos2x into (1-2(sinx)^2) and (2(cosx)^2-1) and working out the answers, I got four values, as listed in my previous post.

EDIT: Sorry, I meant eight values, counting the ±'s. I'm supposed to get four.
 
Last edited:
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top