Finding the force due to uniform charged rod

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves calculating the force on a point charge due to a uniformly charged rod using integration. The charge distribution and the setup are specified, with particular attention to the geometry involved in the electric field calculation.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the integration process for calculating the electric field and the resulting force. There are questions about the factors involved in the equations, particularly the appearance of a factor of 2L in the final expression. Some participants explore the transformation of variables from dq to dy in the integration.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants clarifying their reasoning and questioning assumptions about the integration steps. Some have identified potential misunderstandings regarding the integration variable and the factors involved in the calculations, leading to a deeper exploration of the problem.

Contextual Notes

There is an emphasis on ensuring the correct setup of the problem, including the limits of integration and the relationship between charge density and length. Participants are navigating the complexities of the mathematical expressions without reaching a definitive conclusion.

mattbonner
Messages
14
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A charge Q = 4.35 ×10−4 C is distributed uniformly along a rod of length 2L, extending from y = -21.1 cm to y = +21.1 cm, as shown in the diagram 'on your assignment above. A charge q = 6.05 ×10−6 C, and the same sign as Q, is placed at (D,0), where D = 74.5 cm.

Use integration to compute the total force on q in the x-direction.

Homework Equations


[tex]E = k \int \frac{dq}{r^2}[/tex]
F = qE

The Attempt at a Solution



I've seen the answer, and I think I'm missing a step because when I do it it always turns out different

[tex]E = k \int_{-.211}^{.211} \frac{dq}{(\sqrt{D^2 + y^2})^2}[/tex] * [tex]\frac{D}{\sqrt{y^2 + D^2}}[/tex]


when I simplify this I get,

[tex]F = kqQD \int_{-L}^{L}(D^2 + y^2)^{-\frac{3}{2}}dy[/tex]

however, the correct answer is

[tex]F = \frac{kqQD}{2L}\int_{-L}^{L}(D^2 + y^2)^{-\frac{3}{2}}dy[/tex]

and I'm confused as to where the 2L comes from...
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
mattbonner said:
I've seen the answer, and I think I'm missing a step because when I do it it always turns out different

[tex]E = k \int_{-.211}^{.211} \frac{dq}{(\sqrt{D^2 + y^2})^2}[/tex] * [tex]\frac{D}{\sqrt{y^2 + D^2}}[/tex]


when I simplify this I get,

[tex]F = kqQD \int_{-L}^{L}(D^2 + y^2)^{-\frac{3}{2}}dy[/tex]

I don't know why you're multiplying by what you're multiplying in your first step: you haven't clearly shown your approach (and this is why, I presume, you're missing a small factor).

You correctly substituted in at this step:
[tex]E = k \int_{-.211}^{.211} \frac{dq}{(\sqrt{D^2 + y^2})^2}[/tex]
replacing r with the Pythagorean distance, but could you explain why you multiplied by that factor? (this should help you realize your mistake)
 
Last edited:
Due to symmetry, I multiplied by cosine, which I think is D/r
 
Ok, to find the X component of the electric field, if I'm following you correctly.

So you have:
[tex]E_{x}=kD\int_{-L}^{L}\frac{dq}{(y^{2}+D^{2})^{\frac{3}{2}}}=kD\int_{-L}^{L}(y^{2}+D^{2})^{-\frac{3}{2}}dq[/tex]

Which is just simplifying the multiplication.

But you still are integrating with respect to q, without any q's in the equation! So you need to find some way to transform dq into dy (what you want to be integrating with respect to).
 
Nabeshin said:
Ok, to find the X component of the electric field, if I'm following you correctly.

So you have:
[tex]E_{x}=kD\int_{-L}^{L}\frac{dq}{(y^{2}+D^{2})^{\frac{3}{2}}}=kD\int_{-L}^{L}(y^{2}+D^{2})^{-\frac{3}{2}}dq[/tex]

Which is just simplifying the multiplication.

But you still are integrating with respect to q, without any q's in the equation! So you need to find some way to transform dq into dy (what you want to be integrating with respect to).

ooh I think I'm starting to see it:
dq = [tex]\lambda dy[/tex]
and
[tex]\lambda = \frac{Q}{2L}[/tex]

and then [tex]\lambda[/tex] can be brought out of the integral and that's where the 2L comes from!

Thank you so much! This was bugging me for quite a while.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
42
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K