Finding the length of the major and minor axis of ellipse.

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around finding the lengths of the major and minor axes of an ellipse traced by a vector \(\vec E\) as a function of time. Participants explore the application of differential calculus to identify maximum and minimum values of the vector's components, aiming to determine the axes' lengths.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • Alan presents a vector \(\vec E\) and seeks to use differential calculus to find the lengths of the major and minor axes by identifying the maximum and minimum values of its derivative.
  • Another participant suggests that instead of setting the derivative to zero, Alan should find points where \(\vec E\) is perpendicular to its tangent vector, leading to a different approach for identifying the axes.
  • Alan expresses gratitude for the clarification and acknowledges a lapse in memory regarding vectors and tangents.
  • Alan attempts to verify the subsequent steps involving trigonometric identities and relationships between the components of \(\vec E\) to derive angles related to the axes.
  • Another participant notes that due to the use of the tangent function, Alan will obtain angles within a specific range and mentions the periodic nature of the solutions.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the approach of using the tangent vector to find the axes, but the discussion includes varying methods and interpretations of the mathematical steps involved. No consensus is reached on the final solution or the specific values of the axes.

Contextual Notes

The discussion involves complex trigonometric relationships and assumptions about the periodicity of the functions involved, which may affect the interpretation of the angles derived.

yungman
Messages
5,741
Reaction score
291
\vec E\;=\; \hat x E_{x0}\cos(\omega {t} -kz)\;+\;\hat y E_{y0}\cos(\omega{t}-kz+\delta)

For z=0, this is a vector that trace out an ellipse with time t.

I want to

1) to verify that using the definition of differential calculus, we can find the length of the major and minor axis by finding the maximum and minimum of the the derivative of the \vec E. This is by taking the derivative of \vec E and let the derivative equal to zero to get the minimum and maximum value.

2) Find a way to get the maximum and minimum. I don't know how to do this. This is my work:

\frac {\partial \vec E}{\partial t}\;=\; -\hat x \omega E_{x0}\sin(\omega {t} -kz)\;-\;\hat y E_{y0}\sin(\omega{t}-kz+\delta)

For \frac {\partial \vec E}{\partial t}\;=\;0, both components of x and y has to be zero. I don't know how to do this. Please help.

thanks

Alan
 
Physics news on Phys.org
yungman said:
\vec E\;=\; \hat x E_{x0}\cos(\omega {t} -kz)\;+\;\hat y E_{y0}\cos(\omega{t}-kz+\delta)

For z=0, this is a vector that trace out an ellipse with time t.

I want to

1) to verify that using the definition of differential calculus, we can find the length of the major and minor axis by finding the maximum and minimum of the the derivative of the \vec E. This is by taking the derivative of \vec E and let the derivative equal to zero to get the minimum and maximum value.

2) Find a way to get the maximum and minimum. I don't know how to do this. This is my work:

\frac {\partial \vec E}{\partial t}\;=\; -\hat x \omega E_{x0}\sin(\omega {t} -kz)\;-\;\hat y E_{y0}\sin(\omega{t}-kz+\delta)

For \frac {\partial \vec E}{\partial t}\;=\;0, both components of x and y has to be zero. I don't know how to do this. Please help.

thanks

Alan

Hi Alan!

It's not ##\partial \vec E \over \partial t## that has to be zero.

What you are looking for are the 4 points where ##\vec E## is perpendicular to its tangent vector.
Those points correspond to the long axis and the short axis.
The tangent vector is ##\partial \vec E \over \partial t##.
Their dot product has to be zero.
So:

$$\vec E \cdot {\partial \vec E \over \partial t} = 0$$

$$(\hat x E_{x_0}\cos(\omega {t} -kz)+\hat y E_{y_0}\cos(\omega{t}-kz+\delta)) \cdot (-\hat x \omega E_{x_0}\sin(\omega {t} -kz)-\hat y \omega E_{y_0}\sin(\omega{t}-kz+\delta)) = 0$$

$$- \omega E_{x_0}^2 \sin(\omega {t} -kz) \cos(\omega {t} -kz) - \omega E_{y_0}^2 \sin(\omega{t}-kz+\delta) \cos(\omega{t}-kz+\delta) = 0$$

Since ##\sin(2x) = 2 \sin x \cos x##, we get:

$$E_{x_0}^2 \sin(2(\omega {t} -kz)) + E_{y_0}^2 \sin(2(\omega{t}-kz)+2\delta)) = 0$$

You can further simplify this with more trig formulas, yielding a solution for t, and after that, the 4 extreme points you are looking for.
 
Thank you for the help. Now it make sense. It's been a while I worked with vectors and their tangents. The moment you mentioned this, now I remember.

Thanks again

Alan
 
I want to verify the rest of the steps:

For z=0

E^2_{x0}\sin(2\omega t) + E^2_{y0}\sin(2\omega t+2\delta)=0\;\Rightarrow \sin(2\omega t)\;=\;-\frac{E^2_{y0}}{E^2_{x0}}\sin(2\omega t +2\delta)

\sin(A+B)=\sin A \cos B\;+\;\cos A \sin B\;\Rightarrow
\frac{E^2_{y0}}{E^2_{x0}}\;=\;-\frac{\sin 2\omega t}{\sin 2\omega t \cos 2 \delta + \cos 2\omega t \sin 2\delta}\;=\; -\frac{\tan 2\omega t}{\tan 2\omega t \cos 2 \delta + \sin 2\delta}
\Rightarrow\; \tan 2\omega t \;=\;-\frac{E^2_{y0}}{E^2_{x0}} tan 2\omega t \cos 2\delta \;-\;\frac{E^2_{y0}}{E^2_{x0}} \sin 2\delta\;\Rightarrow\; \tan 2\omega t (1+\frac{E^2_{y0}}{E^2_{x0}} \cos 2\delta)\;=\; -\frac{E^2_{y0}}{E^2_{x0}} \sin 2\delta
\Rightarrow \tan 2\omega t\;=\; -\frac { \sin 2 \delta}{\frac{E^2_{x0}}{E^2_{y0}}+\cos 2\delta}
Therefore:
\omega t\;=\;\frac {1}{2} \tan^-1 \left(-\frac {\sin 2 \delta}{\frac{E^2_{x0}}{E^2_{y0}}+\cos 2\delta}\right)

Since \omega t is in radian, so I just measure the angle from x-axis. I should get two angles.
 
Looks good. ;)

Due to the use of ##\tan##, you will get one angle between ##- \frac \pi 4## and ##+ \frac \pi 4##.
From periodicity, the other 3 angles are a multiple of ##\frac \pi 2## from there.

If you fill in your solutions in ##\vec E## and take their lengths, you'll find the half long axis and the half short axis.
 
Thanks

Alan
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K