Finding the Maximum Likelihood Estimate for Theta in a Random Sample of Size 8.

  • Thread starter Thread starter semidevil
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mle
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around finding the Maximum Likelihood Estimate (MLE) for the parameter theta in a random sample of size 8. The likelihood function is proposed as p(k; theta) = theta^k * (1 - theta)^(1 - k), but there is confusion regarding the definitions of the variables n, k, and theta. Participants emphasize the importance of having a clear sample to properly calculate the MLE, as it should maximize the probability of obtaining that specific sample. The sample provided consists of eight observations, with a mix of 1s and 0s, which is essential for calculating the MLE for theta. Clarifying these parameters and ensuring the correct application of the likelihood function is crucial for solving the problem.
semidevil
Messages
156
Reaction score
2
I have a big test coming up, regarding estimators, but I just can't figure out the basics of maximum likilieehood.



so given this example, is this right?

p(k;theta) = theta^k * (1 - theta)^(1 - k), k = 0 1, and 0 < theta < 1.

so it's just the product of the function, and I get:

theta^K * 1 - (theta)^(sum from 1 to n of (k - n)).

then I take the natural log, and differentiate it to get

k/theta + (k - n)/ (1 - theta) = 0.

now, all I need to do is to put it in terms of theta...


first, did I do the first part right? in terms of finding the likelihoo function?

there's a lot of variables and I get confused when I do the products
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's hard to say- you haven't told us what n is or what k and theta are. Which is the parameter? Or are you doing a maximum likelihood estimate for both parameters at the same time?

In particular, I don't see any mention of a SAMPLE. The maximum likelyhood estimate for a parameter(s), given a SAMPLE, is the value of the parameter(s) that makes the probability of getting that particular sample largest.
 
HallsofIvy said:
It's hard to say- you haven't told us what n is or what k and theta are. Which is the parameter? Or are you doing a maximum likelihood estimate for both parameters at the same time?

In particular, I don't see any mention of a SAMPLE. The maximum likelyhood estimate for a parameter(s), given a SAMPLE, is the value of the parameter(s) that makes the probability of getting that particular sample largest.


sorry...ok, so this is a random sample of size 8 w/ x1 = 1, x2 = 0, x3 = 1, x4 = 1, x5 = 0, x6 =1, x7 = 1, and x8 = 0.

I need to find the MLE for theta.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top