Finding the Metric of a Surface

[Ryanonymous]

So say I want to find the metric of a surface, which is obviously 2 dimensions, which is immersed in a 3 dimensional space.

The surface is described by 3 coordinates (x,y,z) in Cartesian, but can be expressed using 2 (r, phi) in polar.

Does this mean you'd end up with a 2 dimensional or 3 dimensional metric?

Thanks.

 

[torquil]

Since you say the metric OF the surface, this is a 2d metric.

Consider an embedding mapping f of your 2D surface in 3D:

f: (u^1,u^2) -> (x^1,x^2,x^3)

where u^1 = r, u^2 = phi, x ^1 = x, x^2 = y, x^3 = z. This would simply be the function that for each (r,phi) gives you the corresponding triple (x,y,z). Also we define components of f by

f^1 (u^1,u^2) = x^1
f^2 (u^1,u^2) = x^2
f^3 (u^1,u^2) = x^3

Then the "induced metric" on your surface can be expressed as:

h_ab = sum_ij df^i/du^a df^j/du^b g_ij

where g_ij is the metric on your 3D space (presumably just the Kronecker delta if your 3D space is Euklidean?), and sum_ij means a sum of all values of i and j. The indices a,b only have the possible values 1,2 since the u-coordinates only have two components, r and phi.

This metric simply reflects the "restriction" of the 3D metric to the 2d surface.

Ref: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Induced_metric

Torquil

 

[solitonion]

Hi Ryan(onomous),

Consider f(x,y) = z, where x=r\cos\phi and y=r\sin\phi,
we calculate the metric via the 1st fundamental form on the surface:

g_{11} = E = x_{,r}x_{,r}+y_{,r}y_{,r}+z_{,r}z_{,r},
g_{12} = F = x_{,r}x_{,\phi}+y_{,r}y_{,\phi}+z_{,r}z_{,\phi},
g_{22} = G = x_{,\phi}x_{,\phi}+y_{,\phi}y_{,\phi}+z_{,\phi}z_{,\phi}.

The line element takes the form

ds^2 = g_{a b} dx^a dx^b = E dr^2 + 2F dr d\phi + G d\phi^2.

That should do it.

 

[haushofer]

So say I want to find the metric of a surface, which is obviously 2 dimensions, which is immersed in a 3 dimensional space.

The surface is described by 3 coordinates (x,y,z) in Cartesian, but can be expressed using 2 (r, phi) in polar.

Does this mean you'd end up with a 2 dimensional or 3 dimensional metric?

Thanks.

You can do this in two ways; either use the explicit pullback from the space R3 to the surface, or "the easy way".

The easy way is the following. Take for example a sphere S2 in a space R3. The space R3 has as line element

<br /> ds^2 = dx^2 + dy^2 + dz^2<br />

Our sphere S2 is parametrized in R3 as

<br /> x^2 + y^2 + z^2 = R^2<br />
where R is the radius of the sphere. This constraint cuts down the number of independent coordinates from 3 to two. Now, for instance, you can "take the differential of this equation" and write

<br /> 2x*dx + 2y*dy + 2z*dz = 0<br />

because R is a constant. If you now rewrite this in terms of, for example, dx = ... and plug this into the expression for the line element of R3, you have found the "induced line element on the sphere by R3". Hope this helps :)