Finding the Normal Force on the Rod of a Paper Roll

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a large roll of paper resting against a wall, held in place by a rod and bracket system. The scenario includes forces acting on the roll, such as gravitational force, applied vertical force, and friction between the paper and the wall. The objective is to determine the force exerted by the rod and the angular acceleration of the roll as it unrolls.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the need for free body diagrams (FBDs) to clarify the forces acting on the roll. There are attempts to incorporate friction into the equations of motion, with some participants questioning the role of friction in the calculations.

Discussion Status

Several participants have shared their attempts at solving the problem, with varying degrees of success. Some have expressed uncertainty about the inclusion of friction and its effects, while others have suggested working through the equations symbolically rather than substituting numerical values prematurely. There is ongoing exploration of the problem without a clear consensus on the correct approach.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention the coefficient of kinetic friction and its implications for the forces involved. There is an acknowledgment of the complexity introduced by the frictional force, which some participants are trying to understand better in relation to the overall dynamics of the system.

student34
Messages
639
Reaction score
21

Homework Statement



A large 16.0 kg roll of paper with radius R=18.0 cm rests against the wall and is held in place by a bracket attached to a rod through the center of the roll. The rod turns without friction in the bracket, and the moment of inertia of the paper and rod about the axis is 0.260 kg m^2. The other end of the bracket is attached by a frictionless hinge to the wall such that the bracket makes an angle of 30.0° with the wall. The weight of the bracket is negligible. The coefficient of kinetic friction between the paper and the wall is μ= 0.25. A constant vertical force F= 60.0 N is applied to the paper, and the paper unrolls.

(a) What is the magnitude of the force that the rod exerts on the paper as it unrolls?

(b) What is the magnitude of the angular acceleration of the roll?

Here is a picture of that someone else found for the same question, https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=544377

Homework Equations



∑Fy = 0

∑Fx = 0

F(reaction) - Tension = 0, so F(rod) = T

F(friction) = μfx(normal)

The Attempt at a Solution



I will try part (a), but this attempt gives me the wrong answer.

∑Fy = T*cos30° - (mg + 60N) = 0

T = (mg + 60N)/cos30° = (16*9.8 + 60N)/cos°30 = 250.3391N

T = F(rod) = 250.3391N.

But the answer is 293N.

I probably need to use the friction, but I don't understand why.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
If you will draw a proper free body diagram for the paper roll, it should be apparent what forces are used to solve this problem.
 
SteamKing said:
If you will draw a proper free body diagram for the paper roll, it should be apparent what forces are used to solve this problem.

My work that I have shown above comes from free body diagrams that I made.

I have drawn 3 different free body diagrams and spent about 5 hours on this question in total. Any help would be greatly appreciated.
 
Can you post your FBDs?
 
SteamKing said:
Can you post your FBDs?

Here is an attachment.
 

Attachments

  • Free Body Diagram.JPG
    Free Body Diagram.JPG
    24.2 KB · Views: 769
There is going to be a frictional force developed between the wall and the paper roll, which will retard the unrolling of the paper. This frictional force should be included in your FBD.
 
SteamKing said:
There is going to be a frictional force developed between the wall and the paper roll, which will retard the unrolling of the paper. This frictional force should be included in your FBD.

I did have a strong feeling that the Ff would have an effect, but I still don't know why. I thought of a case where μ = 1 so that the roll wouldn't even spin versus the case where μ = 0. Both cases seem to have the same effect on the center of mass where the rod is.

It's wrong, but I will show what I did with friction.

μ*T*sin30° = 0.25*250.339N*sin30° = 31.292N. I will assume that this adds to the ∑Fy. So now,

∑Fy = T*cos30° + (-31.292N) - (mg + 60N) = 0

T = 286.47N, which is close but not quite enough.
 
Can anyone see anything wrong with my last post?
 
student34 said:
μ*T*sin30° = 0.25*250.339N*sin30° = 31.292N. I will assume that this adds to the ∑Fy. So now,
You can't plug in a value for T here. T is what you're trying to calculate. Work it all the way through symbolically. Don't plug in any numbers until you have an equation in the form T = ...
 
  • #10
haruspex said:
You can't plug in a value for T here. T is what you're trying to calculate. Work it all the way through symbolically. Don't plug in any numbers until you have an equation in the form T = ...

Oh thanks, I got it!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
4K
Replies
17
Views
3K
Replies
24
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 97 ·
4
Replies
97
Views
6K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K