MHB Finding the Position Vector of Point $B$ on a Line Segment Between $P$ and $Q$

AI Thread Summary
To find the position vector of point B on the line segment between points P and Q, where P = (1,2,-1) and Q = (3,1,0), it is established that the distance from P to B is twice the distance from Q to B. Using the parameterization of the line segment, the distances are calculated as d(P,B) = √6 t₀ and d(Q,B) = √6 (1-t₀). Setting the equation √6 t₀ = 2√6 (1-t₀) leads to the solution t₀ = 2/3. Consequently, the position vector of B is determined to be (7/3, 4/3, -1/3).
Guest2
Messages
192
Reaction score
0
Let $P = (1,2,-1)$ and $Q = (3,1,0)$. A point $B$ lies on the line segment between $P$ and $Q$. Given that its distance from $P$ is twice its distance from $Q$. Find the position vector of $B$.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
The equation for a line segment is very similar to that for a line, it is:

$(x,y,z) = tQ + (1-t)P,\ 0 \leq t \leq 1$ (this one goes FROM $P$ TO $Q$, as $t$ goes from 0 to 1, if we switch $P$ and $Q$ it goes the other way).

In our case, this is $(2t+1,2-t,t-1)$ with $0 \leq t \leq 1$.

Suppose we choose $0 < t_0 < 1$. Let's use the standard distance formula, to calculate the distance of the point $B$ corresponding to $t_0$.

We have $d(P,B) = \sqrt{(1-(2t_0+1))^2 + (2-(2-t_0))^2 + (-1-(t_0-1))^2}$

$= \sqrt{4t_0^2 + t_0^2 + t_0^2} = \sqrt{6}t_0$

and $d(Q,B) = \sqrt{(3-(2t_0+1))^2 + (1-(2-t_0))^2 + (0-(t_0 - 1))^2}$

$= \sqrt{(2-2t_0)^2 + (-1+t_0)^2 + (t_0-1)^2} = \sqrt{6}(1-t_0)$ (we use $1-t_0$ since we want the positive square root).

Can you continue?

(Intuitively, how far along the interval from 0 to 1 do you have to be, to where how far you have to go is half of how far you've come? Use this to check your answer).
 
Deveno said:
The equation for a line segment is very similar to that for a line, it is:

$(x,y,z) = tQ + (1-t)P,\ 0 \leq t \leq 1$ (this one goes FROM $P$ TO $Q$, as $t$ goes from 0 to 1, if we switch $P$ and $Q$ it goes the other way).

In our case, this is $(2t+1,2-t,t-1)$ with $0 \leq t \leq 1$.

Suppose we choose $0 < t_0 < 1$. Let's use the standard distance formula, to calculate the distance of the point $B$ corresponding to $t_0$.

We have $d(P,B) = \sqrt{(1-(2t_0+1))^2 + (2-(2-t_0))^2 + (-1-(t_0-1))^2}$

$= \sqrt{4t_0^2 + t_0^2 + t_0^2} = \sqrt{6}t_0$

and $d(Q,B) = \sqrt{(3-(2t_0+1))^2 + (1-(2-t_0))^2 + (0-(t_0 - 1))^2}$

$= \sqrt{(2-2t_0)^2 + (-1+t_0)^2 + (t_0-1)^2} = \sqrt{6}(1-t_0)$ (we use $1-t_0$ since we want the positive square root).

Can you continue?

(Intuitively, how far along the interval from 0 to 1 do you have to be, to where how far you have to go is half of how far you've come? Use this to check your answer).

Thank you!

Since it's distance from $P$ is twice its distance from $Q$, it's

$\sqrt{6}t_0 = 2 \sqrt{6}(1-t_0) \implies t_0 = \frac{2}{3}$, so $\vec{B} = \left(\frac{7}{3}, \frac{4}{3}, -\frac{1}{3}\right)$
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Back
Top