Finding the Potential at a specific point in this Circuit

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the electric potential at Point A in a given circuit with two batteries and three resistors. The user sets up equations based on Kirchhoff's rules but encounters difficulties in solving them, particularly with the relationships between the currents. They express confusion regarding the compatibility of their equations and the signs used. The importance of having a diagram for clarity is emphasized, as it can help identify errors in the calculations. The thread highlights the complexities of circuit analysis and the need for careful attention to detail in current direction and sign conventions.
tmint
Messages
6
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Here is the circuit: http://gyazo.com/1e11d9208da0aa29d10b72128844ad40
What is the Electric Potential at Point A?
Battery 1: 6.76 V
Battery 2: 11.8 V
Resistance 1: 100Ω
Resistance 2: 217Ω
Resistance 3: 312Ω



Homework Equations


Kirchhoff's Rules
V=IR


The Attempt at a Solution



I first set up my Currents so that Current 1(left)+ Current 2(down middle)= Current 3(right)

Let c be left of point a, b the point bottom of point a, d left of b, e right of point a and f right of b.


cabdc: -217(Current 1)+100(Current 2)=-6.76
=-217(Current 1)+100(Current 2)

aefba: -312(Current 3)-11.8-100(Current 2)=0
=-312(Current 3)-100(Current 2)=11.8

Let Current 2= Current 3-1

So..

-217(Current 1)+100(Current 3-1)=-6.76

-312(Current 3)-100(Current 3-1)=11.8

And I get

312(Current 3)-217(Current 1)+200(Current 3-Current 1)=-18.56

I'm stuck at this step, could use some help.

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It is difficult to spot errors (and easy to make them) when working without a diagram. But the two statements below seem to lack compatibility. Check the signs/directions you are using.

cabdc: -217(Current 1)+100(Current 2)=-6.76
Current 2= Current 3-1
 
Last edited:
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top