Finding the shortest possiblee travel time

  • Thread starter Thread starter dotfortun3
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Time Travel
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the minimum travel time for a motorcycle and a car under specific acceleration and deceleration constraints. The motorcycle problem involves finding the optimal speed to accelerate to before decelerating to a stop over a distance of 800 meters. Participants suggest using kinematic equations to establish distance and speed relationships, emphasizing the need to balance acceleration and deceleration phases. A similar car problem highlights the complexity of not reaching maximum speed before needing to brake, prompting a breakdown of the journey into separate acceleration and deceleration equations. Overall, the conversation centers on applying physics principles to optimize travel time while adhering to vehicle limitations.
dotfortun3
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A motorcycle can attain a maximum speed of 55 m/s, accelerate at 5 m/s^2 and decelerate at 7 m/s^2. If the motorcycle starts from a rest, find the minimum possible time it takes the motorcycle to stop exactly 800 m further down the road.


Homework Equations


d=rt is the only one I could think of


The Attempt at a Solution


Well, I know that I need to find the best speed to accelerate to, to be able to stop quicker and have the shortest time possible, but I really need help getting started with this
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The minimum time for the trip is such that the mc accelerates to top speed as quickly as possible, and stays there until such time as the trip is completed by decelerating to 0 speed at the maximum possible deceleration rate. The time interval and the then the distances for the beginning and ending portions of the trip can then be calculated. With this information, the time interval for the middle constant speed portion can be found.
 
Thank you so much! I really was just over thinking the problem and thought that I was doing it wrong! I feel dumb now! :blushing: Thanks again!
 
I have a similar question to this problem. My car can accelerate uniformly (calculated to be 1.788 m/s^2) to 120 mi/h (53.6448 m/s) in 30 s, and its maximum deceleration is -6.86 m/s^2. I'm supposed to find the minimum time to travel 0.5 mi (804.672 m) with the car beginning and ending at rest.

My problem is that the car does not reach it's maximum speed before braking since the 30 s it takes to accelerate to maximum speed travels 0.5 mi to begin with, and the car must be at rest at the end. I'm having trouble trouble setting this problem up.
 
diablo, since your maximum speed will not be reached the problem becomes a little bit more complex. I would approach the problem by creating two distance equations for the car. One for the car speeding up and one for the car slowing down. You will have two unkowns in each equation which you will then solve for.
 
Thank you for the lead. I don't know if I got it right, but I started with two vf^2 = vi^2 + 2ax equations, one for speeding up and one for slowing down. Although I did not know vf for speeding up or vi for slowing down, I assumed the quickest would be if the car began to decelerate at a certain speed, hence my assumption is that vf and vi would be equal, a vmax if you will. Combining this with the knowledge that the distance of speeding up and the distance of slowing down ultimately added up to 0.5 mi, I set both equations to 0.5 mi and solved for a common max speed. Using this speed, I then plugged it into x = vi*t + 2at^2 to find the respective times for speeding up and slowing down from the presumed vmax.

I got an answer out of this method, but I'm not so sure that my assumptions give the minimum time it would take to drive 0.5 mi. See any flaws in my logic?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top