Finding the Solution for a Tricky ln Equation

  • Thread starter Thread starter dnt
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ln
AI Thread Summary
The equation ln(x+1) = x-3 can be transformed into e^(x-3) = x + 1. However, it is impossible to express the solution for x using elementary functions due to the presence of both transcendental and non-transcendental components. To find an approximate solution, numerical methods or graphing techniques are recommended. Specifically, one can graph y = e^x - 3 and y = x + 1 to identify their intersection point. Ultimately, an algebraic solution does not exist for this equation.
dnt
Messages
238
Reaction score
0
ln (x+1) = x-3

i know ln is log base e so the equation becomes:

e^(x-3) = x + 1

and i can rearrange using algebra to get:

e^x = e^3(x+1)

but now I am stuck...how can i separate the x's to solve for it?

thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You can't write the solution x in terms of elementary functions like e^x and ln(x). You'll probably have to use a calculator to get an approximate numerical solution.
 
ah thanks.
 
In general, there is no "algebraic" solution for problems that involve both a transcendental function of x (such as ex) and non-transcendental function of x (such as x+1). You will have to use some approximation method (such as graphing y= ex-3 and y= x+1 and seeing where they cross).
 
I picked up this problem from the Schaum's series book titled "College Mathematics" by Ayres/Schmidt. It is a solved problem in the book. But what surprised me was that the solution to this problem was given in one line without any explanation. I could, therefore, not understand how the given one-line solution was reached. The one-line solution in the book says: The equation is ##x \cos{\omega} +y \sin{\omega} - 5 = 0##, ##\omega## being the parameter. From my side, the only thing I could...
Back
Top