Finding the solution of the wave equation that satisfies the boundary conditions

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around solving the wave equation while satisfying specific boundary conditions. The original poster expresses difficulty in applying these conditions to derive simultaneous equations for the solution.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to understand how to apply boundary conditions but feels stuck and unable to find similar examples. Some participants suggest looking into D'Alembert's formula as a potential solution, while others note the need to translate notation from different sources.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing guidance on notation and suggesting resources. There is no explicit consensus on the approach yet, as the original poster continues to seek clarity on the topic.

Contextual Notes

The original poster mentions difficulty in finding similar examples and expresses confusion regarding the explanation of D'Alembert's formula. There may be assumptions about familiarity with certain mathematical notations that are being questioned.

Jack_O
Messages
64
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



9841e864.jpg


Homework Equations



N/A

The Attempt at a Solution




8cf112dc.jpg


Really stuck with this, i can't work out how to apply the boundary conditions to generate the simultaneous equations to find the specific solution. Can't find any similar examples either.
Help appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Do you know D'Alambert's formula? It will give you the solution almost immediately!
 
Just looked it up on wikipedia but it confuses me, it doesn't explain it very well.
 
You need to translate their notation to yours. They put it thusly.

[tex]u_{tt}-c^2u_{xx}=0[/tex]

The subscripts indicate partial differentiation, ie [itex]u_{tt}=\frac{\partial^2u}{\partial t^2}[/itex]. So their [itex]g(x)[/itex] equals your [itex]e^{-x^2}[/itex] and their [itex]h(x)[/itex] equals your [itex]2cxe^{-x^2}[/itex]. It's just plug and chug from there.
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K