How Do You Find Space Charge Density from an Electric Field?

AI Thread Summary
To find space charge density from an electric field, the divergence of the electric field is crucial, as it relates to charge density through Gauss's Law in differential form. The equation used is (\rho/\epsilon_0) = ∇·E, where ∇ represents the divergence operator. The discussion clarifies that while the first part of the problem involves calculating the divergence and curl of the electric field, this information is applicable to the second part, which seeks the space charge density. Participants emphasize the importance of understanding the vector field's representation in Cartesian coordinates for accurate calculations. Ultimately, the approach involves deriving the relationship between the electric field and charge density through the divergence operation.
weathergal
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I am taking a lightning class for my atmospheric science masters degree. However its been awhile and I am having trouble with remembering how to do the physics portion of it. I hope someone can help me!

Homework Statement



I have an electric field \vec{}E=E_{}x\widehat{}X+E_{}y\widehat{}Y+E_{}z\widehat{}Z Find the divergence and curl of this electric field. I have done this with no problem. The second part is where I am confused. I have to find the space density charge of \vec{}E=E(r)\dot{}r\widehat{}

Homework Equations



I have an equation for space charge density but am unsure how to derive it. The space charge equation I have is (\rho/\epsilon)=delta dot E

Can some one give me some pointers on even how to find a space charge denstiy?\
Thanks

The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
Do you really have to derive the equation? Based on what you've posted, it seems that you only have to use it.
\frac{\rho}{\epsilon_0} = \vec{\nabla}\cdot \vec{E}
You've said that you know how to calculate the divergence and curl of a vector field. How can you apply that to this problem?
 
The equation in 2. is Gauss's Law for the Electric Field in differential form.

It's not delta, but nabla, the symbol for del, the vector differential operator. In this case nabla dot E means divergance of the electric field.
 
Well this is a two part question. The first part is to find the curl and divergence. Part B is if E=E(r)\widehat{r} what is the space charge. I just firgure that part a is used in part b. I guess I am wrong. I think the answer to this would be just

(\rho/\epsilon)=dE(r)/dr
 
weathergal said:
The first part is to find the curl and divergence. Part B is if E=E(r)\widehat{r} what is the space charge. I just firgure that part a is used in part b. I guess I am wrong.
No, you're correct. Part a is used in part b. Or, at least, you could use part a in part b, though it's not the only way.

Have you learned anything about calculating the divergence in non-Cartesian coordinate systems? If so, you can use that knowledge for part b. If not, consider this: how can you express the vector field you're given in part b, E_r\hat{r}, in terms of the Cartesian unit vectors \hat{x},\hat{y},\hat{z}?
weathergal said:
I think the answer to this would be just

(\rho/\epsilon)=dE(r)/dr
Not quite, but you're thinking along the right lines.
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top