Finding the time and maximum height at highest point

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the time to reach the highest point and the maximum height of a projectile launched at 80 m/s at a 60° angle. The initial vertical velocity is calculated as approximately 69.282 m/s. Participants point out errors in the quadratic formula application and emphasize the importance of maintaining precision in calculations to avoid rounding errors. The correct time to reach the maximum height is determined to be around 6.8 seconds, highlighting the need for careful evaluation of equations used. Overall, the conversation stresses the significance of accuracy in physics calculations.
NotFrankieMuniz
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement

:[/B]

A projectile is given initial velocity 80 m/s ( V0 ) at angle 60° above the horizontal. Find the time it takes to reach to the highest point and find the maximum height. (g = -10 m/s2)

Homework Equations

:[/B]

1. y_{final} = y_{initial} + v_{y_{initial}}t + \frac {1}{2}gt^2

2. v_{final}^2 = v_{y_{intial}^2} + 2g(y_{final} - y_{intial})

The Attempt at a Solution

:
[/B]
The first thing I did was to find the velocity of the y-component ( v_{y_{initial}}):

v_{y_{initial}} = (80 m/s)({\sin 60}^{\circ})

v_{y_{initial}} = 69 m/s

Since I know that v_{final}^2 is 0 m/s at the highest point, I can use Equation 2 to figure out the max height. With v_{y_{initial}^2} known and t unknown:

v_{final}^2 = v_{y_{intial}^2} + 2g(y_{final} - y_{intial})

0 = v_{y_{intial}^2} + 2gy

y = \frac{-v_{y_{intial}^2}}{2g}

y = \frac{-(69 m/s)^2}{2(-10 m/s^2)}

y = 238 m

With the max height known, I can use Equation 1 to get the time to reach the max height:

y_{final} = y_{initial} + v_{y_{initial}}t + \frac {1}{2}gt^2

238 m = (0m) + (69 m/s)t + \frac {1}{2}(-10m/s^2)t^2

(5m/s^2)t^2 - (69 m/s)t + (238 m) = 0

From there, I used the quadratic formula where a = 5 m/s2, b = -69 m/s, and c = 238 m

The results that I got were t = 175 s and t = 170 s, which doesn't seem right.

Anyone care to point me to the right direction?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
A couple of things. First, keep some extra decimal places in your intermediate values that you will be using for further calculations. This will prevent rounding and truncation errors from creeping into latter calculations. Rounding for presentation purposes is fine, but use full precision in your calculations. So for example, your initial vertical velocity should be something like 69.282 m/s.

Speaking of initial vertical velocity, you've shown the cosine function rather than sine function in its calculation. I presume this is a typo since you've show a valid value for the result.

Something appears to have gone awry in your evaluation of the quadratic at the end. Try the calculation again.

Note that if you happen to have some differential calculus under your belt, you can get at the time of the maximum height much more easily by just maximizing the vertical trajectory equation...
 
gneill said:
A couple of things. First, keep some extra decimal places in your intermediate values that you will be using for further calculations. This will prevent rounding and truncation errors from creeping into latter calculations. Rounding for presentation purposes is fine, but use full precision in your calculations. So for example, your initial vertical velocity should be something like 69.282 m/s.

Speaking of initial vertical velocity, you've shown the cosine function rather than sine function in its calculation. I presume this is a typo since you've show a valid value for the result.

Something appears to have gone awry in your evaluation of the quadratic at the end. Try the calculation again.

Note that if you happen to have some differential calculus under your belt, you can get at the time of the maximum height much more easily by just maximizing the vertical trajectory equation...
I redid the quadratic calculation and got t = 69.1 s and t = 68.9 s, which still doesn't seem right.
 
NotFrankieMuniz said:
I redid the quadratic calculation and got t = 69.1 s and t = 68.9 s, which still doesn't seem right.
The answer should be less than 10 seconds. I guess you'll have to show your work in some detail so we can see what's happening.
 
Don't forget the 2a in the denominator for the quadratic equation.
As gneill said, your imperfect approximations are giving you imperfect answers.
 
gneill said:
The answer should be less than 10 seconds. I guess you'll have to show your work in some detail so we can see what's happening.
Ah, looks like I forgot to punch in a set of parenthesis in my calculator.

t = 6.8 s

I also just realized that I can easily calculate without having to use the quadratic formula the t with:

v_{y_{final}} = v_{y_{intial}} -gt
 
gneill said:
First, keep some extra decimal places in your intermediate values that you will be using for further calculations.
Better still, never plug in numbers until the end. In the specific case of finding the maximum height, you would have found ##s=\frac{v_0^2\sin^2(\theta)}{2g}##. Plugging in the angle, ##\sin^2(\frac{\pi}3)=\frac 34##, avoiding any approximations.
 
Back
Top