Finding the Zeroes of a Secant Graph

  • Thread starter Thread starter Sabellic
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Graph Secant
AI Thread Summary
To find the zeroes of the function y = 2 sec(-2x + 180°) + 3, the equation is set to zero, leading to -1.5 = sec[-2(x - 90°)]. The challenge arises because the secant function does not yield valid results for values outside its defined range, complicating the algebraic solution. The inverse secant function, arcsec(-1.5), can be used to derive x values, resulting in x = 89.5 after simplification. The discussion highlights the difficulty in solving secant equations algebraically compared to using graphing tools.
Sabellic
Messages
68
Reaction score
0
This is a continuation of my previous post, so please bear with me

Homework Statement


Find the zeroes of the following function:

y= 2 sec (-2x+180deg) + 3

Homework Equations



Break down the equation into:

y= 2 sec -2(x-90deg) + 3;

Finding zeroes, means finding the x values when y=0, therefore:

0=2 sec [-2(x-90deg)]+3

The Attempt at a Solution



0=2 sec [-2(x-90deg)]+3

-3 = 2 sec [-2(x-90deg)]

-1.5 = sec [-2(x-90deg)]

-1.5/sec = [-2(x-90deg)]

^ this is where I get stuck. Because the inverse of sec or cos (sec^-1; cos^-1) is Error or Undefined. So the whole thing explodes. Now, I can tell when the graph crosses the x-axis (and therefore has a y=0 value) on a Graphing tool, but how can I find this out algebraically?

Thanks for the assistance.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Sabellic said:
This is a continuation of my previous post, so please bear with me

Homework Statement


Find the zeroes of the following function:

y= 2 sec (-2x+180deg) + 3


Homework Equations



Break down the equation into:

y= 2 sec -2(x-90deg) + 3;

Finding zeroes, means finding the x values when y=0, therefore:

0=2 sec [-2(x-90deg)]+3



The Attempt at a Solution



0=2 sec [-2(x-90deg)]+3

-3 = 2 sec [-2(x-90deg)]

-1.5 = sec [-2(x-90deg)]

-1.5/sec = [-2(x-90deg)]
Now that's just silly. "sec" is NOT a number, sec[-29x- 90)] is NOT just "sec" times [-29x- 90]. You cannot just divide by "sec". You get rid of the secant function by using its inverse, arcsec(x). -2(x- 90)= arcsec(-1.5). Since secant of 1/cosine and cosine is always between - 1 and 1, secant= 1/cosine is between -1 and -infinity or 1 and infinity. arcsec(x)= sec-1(x) is definitely defined for x= -1.5.

^ this is where I get stuck. Because the inverse of sec or cos (sec^-1; cos^-1) is Error or Undefined. So the whole thing explodes. Now, I can tell when the graph crosses the x-axis (and therefore has a y=0 value) on a Graphing tool, but how can I find this out algebraically?

Thanks for the assistance.
 
editted
 
Last edited:
This is what I am getting:
-2(x- 90)= arcsec(-1.5)

-2(x- 90)=0.999657325
x-90=-0.499828662
x=89.5
 
I tried to combine those 2 formulas but it didn't work. I tried using another case where there are 2 red balls and 2 blue balls only so when combining the formula I got ##\frac{(4-1)!}{2!2!}=\frac{3}{2}## which does not make sense. Is there any formula to calculate cyclic permutation of identical objects or I have to do it by listing all the possibilities? Thanks
Since ##px^9+q## is the factor, then ##x^9=\frac{-q}{p}## will be one of the roots. Let ##f(x)=27x^{18}+bx^9+70##, then: $$27\left(\frac{-q}{p}\right)^2+b\left(\frac{-q}{p}\right)+70=0$$ $$b=27 \frac{q}{p}+70 \frac{p}{q}$$ $$b=\frac{27q^2+70p^2}{pq}$$ From this expression, it looks like there is no greatest value of ##b## because increasing the value of ##p## and ##q## will also increase the value of ##b##. How to find the greatest value of ##b##? Thanks
Back
Top