Finding Thevenin Equivalent Circuit

[opticaltempest]

Hello,

I am working on the following problem:

http://img155.imageshack.us/img155/2478/thevpo9.jpg

I am stuck on this seemingly simple circuit problem. I've worked many Thevenin circuit problems in my introductory circuit analysis. This problem is from a new class and seems different. I realize that I must first find the open-circuit voltage at the terminals. After that I need to the Thevenin equivalent resistance by using

\LARGE R_{Th}=V_{Th}/I_{sc}.

First let me find the open-circuit voltage v_{oc}. Is this correct?

We know the circuit current is g_mv. Thus the open circuit voltage which is the voltage across the voltage-controlled current source is

Using KVL:

\LARGE -v_s+v-v_{oc}=0 \implies v_{oc}=v-v_s

and

\LARGE v=(g_mv)R_1.

So we have

<br /> \LARGE v_{oc} = (g_mv)R_1-v_s \implies<br /> \LARGE v_{oc} = (0.002v)(50k\Omega)-v_s \implies<br /> \LARGE v_{oc} = 100v-v_s<br />

Does this look correct for the open circuit voltage?

 

[mjsd]

V_oc = voltage across controlled current source, and assuming +polarity on the arrow-head end, you then have V_oc = Vs - V = Vs - IR where I is given by -gm V (passive ref scheme)

 

[opticaltempest]

Does this solution look correct? I see where I was wrong while finding the open-circuit voltage.

http://img293.imageshack.us/img293/1340/image0001tv1.jpg

http://img177.imageshack.us/img177/4223/image0002xe6.jpg

http://img210.imageshack.us/img210/9513/image0003zi6.jpg

 

[mjsd]

judging by the final diagram with + on top and - on bottom at output, your short circuit current may have been defined in the wrong direction, hence leading to an overall -ve sign error.

 

[CEL]

Hello,

I am working on the following problem:

http://img155.imageshack.us/img155/2478/thevpo9.jpg

I am stuck on this seemingly simple circuit problem. I've worked many Thevenin circuit problems in my introductory circuit analysis. This problem is from a new class and seems different. I realize that I must first find the open-circuit voltage at the terminals. After that I need to the Thevenin equivalent resistance by using

\LARGE R_{Th}=V_{Th}/I_{sc}.

First let me find the open-circuit voltage v_{oc}. Is this correct?

We know the circuit current is g_mv. Thus the open circuit voltage which is the voltage across the voltage-controlled current source is

Using KVL:

\LARGE -v_s+v-v_{oc}=0 \implies v_{oc}=v-v_s

and

\LARGE v=(g_mv)R_1.

So we have

<br /> \LARGE v_{oc} = (g_mv)R_1-v_s \implies<br /> \LARGE v_{oc} = (0.002v)(50k\Omega)-v_s \implies<br /> \LARGE v_{oc} = 100v-v_s<br />

Does this look correct for the open circuit voltage?

The current g_mv is entering the minus terminal of v, so you should have v = -g_mvR_1 or v\left[1+g_mR_1]=0 so, v = 0 and v_{oc}=v_s

 

[opticaltempest]

or v\left[1+g_mR_1]=0 so, v = 0 and v_{oc}=v_s

How did you get this? Why isn't it

v_{oc}=v_s-v ?

Thanks

 

[CEL]

How did you get this? Why isn't it

v_{oc}=v_s-v ?

Thanks

It is! But since v=0, v_{oc}=v_s-0=v_s.

 

[mjsd]

your expression is pretty much correct, all you need is to look at the limit as v->0. basically R_th has to be infinite... such equivalent circuit does not exist in real life, only in the realm of an analysis tool.

 

[opticaltempest]

I'm still confused. Why is v=0 and not left as v=-g_mvR_1?

Why do we need to look at the limit of v as v \rightarrow 0 ?

Correction: limit of R_{Th} as v \rightarrow 0

 

[CEL]

I'm still confused. Why is v=0 and not left as v=-g_mvR_1?

Why do we need to look at the limit of v as v \rightarrow 0 ?

Correction: limit of R_{Th} as v \rightarrow 0

You have v in both members of the equation v=-g_mvR_1. So, unless g_mR_1=1, which it is not, you must have v=0.
Short circuiting the output you have i_{sc}=\frac{v_s}{R_1}+g_mv.
Since v=v_s, i_{sc}=\frac{v_s}{R_1}+g_mv_s=v_s\left[\frac{1}{R_1}+g_m\right]
So
R_{th}=\frac{v_{oc}}{i_{sc}}=\frac{1}{\frac{1}{R_1}+g_m}=\frac{R_1}{1+g_mR_1}.

 

[opticaltempest]

Thanks CEL and mjsd for all of the help on this problem. It now makes sense. I found out the answer is R=495 ohms and vth=vs. This is definitely the correct answer when I substitute the given values into the problem. Thanks again!

 

[mjsd]

ok... i shouldn't have said R_th is infinite.. I evaluated the limit incorrectly.. since vs = v,