Finding thickness of paper based on rate of change of radius and constant speed

AI Thread Summary
To determine the thickness of paper based on the change in diameter of a roll and its linear speed, one can use the relationship between the rate of change of volume and the speed of the paper. The formula involves equating the rate of volume leaving the roll, represented as w*x*v, with the rate of volume change based on the instantaneous radius, expressed as d/dt of pi*r^2*w. By calculating the ratio of the change in radius squared over time to the speed, the thickness can be inferred. This method allows for accurate measurement even if the speed varies between different rolls. Understanding these relationships is crucial for effectively managing the paper roll's deceleration process.
Jaboska
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I need find the thickness of a piece of paper based on the known linear speed of the paper coming off the roll and the change in diameter of the roll.

I have the ability to see the linear speed. It is consistant but changes from roll to roll. I know the starting radius, instantaneous radius and ending radius. The thickness of the paper is consistant but changes from roll to roll.


The application for this is stopping the roll of paper with only a 1/4 of an inch left on it with a starting radius of about 24 in and a constant speed varring between 70 to 300 m/min.

I already have the formulas to calculate when to begin deceleration, but I need know the thickness of the paper based only of the rate of change of the radius.

Thank you for your help
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Does the speed vary only when the roll changes, or does it vary also on the same roll?
 
Jaboska said:
I already have the formulas to calculate when to begin deceleration, but I need know the thickness of the paper based only of the rate of change of the radius.
You can do it by equating changes in volume. The rate the volume is leaving, for an instantaneous radius r, is d/dt of pi*r2*w, where w is the (irrelevant) width of the paper. The rate the volume is coming off is w*x*v, where v is the speed and x is what you want. So we have:
pi*dr2/dt = v*x.
All you need to know is the ratio of dr2/dt over v, at any given time, and you can infer x. If you can't measure dr2/dt instantaneously, you have to infer it over a finite time, like delta r2 over delta t, and that will be right because it doesn't change if v and x are constant.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top