Finding Total Number of Optical Field Modes for Visible Light

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the total number of optical field modes for visible light using the density of field modes equation. The equation ρ_kdk = k^2/π^2 dk is established, leading to the relationship ρ_λdλ = 8π/λ^4dλ. The user expresses confusion about whether to set λ at 400nm and dλ at 300nm or to perform an integration to find the number of modes. Participants confirm that integration is necessary and validate the user's approach and result. The conversation concludes with a positive acknowledgment of the assistance provided.
freddie123
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
Calculate the total number of optical field modes per unit volume for visible light (i.e. in the range 400-700nm).
Relevant Equations
ρ_kdk = k^2/π^2 dk
k=2π/λ
ρ_kdk = k^2/π^2 dk is the density of field modes (what we are trying to solve for here), and as ρ_kdk = ρ_λdλ, and k=2π/λ, we can rearrange this to get ρ_λdλ = 8π/λ^4dλ
This is where my confusion lies. I am not sure what to do next. I know this equation physically means the number of modes per volume for frequencies between λ and λ+dλ, so do we just take λ as 400nm and then dλ is 300nm? Or are we meant to integrate to get
-8π/3[(1/(700x10^-9)^3 - 1/(400x10^-9)^3)] = 1.06x10^20 number of modes??

I don't know how to use this equation to get the number of optical field modes per unit volume for the given frequency range.

Help would be much appreciated.

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, you need to integrate. Your result appears correct.
 
DrClaude said:
Yes, you need to integrate. Your result appears correct.
Awesome. Thank you! ☺️
 
At first, I derived that: $$\nabla \frac 1{\mu}=-\frac 1{{\mu}^3}\left((1-\beta^2)+\frac{\dot{\vec\beta}\cdot\vec R}c\right)\vec R$$ (dot means differentiation with respect to ##t'##). I assume this result is true because it gives valid result for magnetic field. To find electric field one should also derive partial derivative of ##\vec A## with respect to ##t##. I've used chain rule, substituted ##\vec A## and used derivative of product formula. $$\frac {\partial \vec A}{\partial t}=\frac...