Finding Velocity and angle for magnetic field

kaikaii
Messages
5
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A proton moves in a horizontal plane with a velocity v. It is found that when there is a magnetic field of 10(power - 2)T (magnitude) pointing from west to east, the magnetic force on the proton has a magnitude of 3.2 x 10(power of -16)N and points downwards. It is also found of that when a magnetic field of 10(power - 2)T pointing from south to north, the magnetic force on proton has a magnitude of 3.2 x 10(power - 16)N and points downward direction. Determine the magnitude and direction of the velocity.

I guess I'm required to find velocity and also the angle. Any ideas?


Homework Equations



F = qvB sin (theta)

The Attempt at a Solution



3.2 x 10(power - 16) = 1.6 x 10 (power - 19) * v * 10(power - 2) sin (theta)

I'm stuck here. i don't know how to continue on to find the velocity and also the theta.

Is there any other ways to find it?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
welcome to pf!

hi kaikaii! welcome to pf! :wink:

show us what you've tried, and where you're stuck, and then we'll know how to help! :smile:
 
Hi! I have editted the attempt part. Do help solve the problem. Been pondering over it for sometime.
 
hi kaikaii! :smile:

(have a theta: θ and try using the X2 tag just above the Reply box :wink:)
kaikaii said:
3.2 x 10(power - 16) = 1.6 x 10 (power - 19) * v * 10(power - 2) sin (theta)

i really don't understand what you're doing :confused:

(and why aren't there two equations for the two different fields?)

please write it out properly​
 
tiny-tim said:
hi kaikaii! :smile:

(have a theta: θ and try using the X2 tag just above the Reply box :wink:)


i really don't understand what you're doing :confused:

(and why aren't there two equations for the two different fields?)

please write it out properly​


I subsitute the values into F = qvB sin (theta)...

I didnt sub two since those values are the same isn't it?
 
To solve this, I first used the units to work out that a= m* a/m, i.e. t=z/λ. This would allow you to determine the time duration within an interval section by section and then add this to the previous ones to obtain the age of the respective layer. However, this would require a constant thickness per year for each interval. However, since this is most likely not the case, my next consideration was that the age must be the integral of a 1/λ(z) function, which I cannot model.
Back
Top