Finding Velocity of Traverse Wave on String Using Dimensional Analysis

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on understanding the relationship between the velocity of a traverse wave on a string and its tension and mass per length. The user seeks clarification on the units for "mass per length," ultimately confirming it is kg/m. They express confidence in their grasp of dimensional analysis but initially struggle with the concept of units versus dimensions. The conversation highlights the importance of distinguishing between these terms in physics. Overall, the thread emphasizes the significance of proper unit identification in solving physics problems.
pinsickle
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The velocity of a traverse wave traveling along a string depends on the tension of the string, F, which has units of force, and its mass per length unit u.
Assume v = F^x * u^y. The values may be found using dimensional analysis.


Homework Equations


I am pretty sure I understand dimensional analysis. I just don't know what the units are for "mass per length" . I am assuming that the Force is in Newtons (kg * m /s^2) and I know velocity is (m/s). Sorry for the goofy question but I'm still waiting on my book to come in from Amazon and I can't to find an answer on Google for mass per length. Thanks


The Attempt at a Solution


I don't want help with solving the problem itself. I am just wondering what mass per unit length means so I can solve the question.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Nevermind I just figured out it is kg/m
 
pinsickle said:
Nevermind I just figured out it is kg/m

They are distinguishing between "units" and "dimensions" -- for example, velocity has dimensions length/time no matter what system of units you use. But yes, it's easier just to put the units in.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top