Finding Water on the Moon: A Proposal for an Experiment

AI Thread Summary
The discussion proposes an experiment to find water on the Moon, particularly in the Aristarchus region, which is noted for its volcanic appearance. It suggests that volcanic activity could release steam that freezes into frost during the lunar night, later evaporating into fog with morning sunlight. The proposed method involves using a high-resolution telescope to capture video of the area as it transitions from night to day, looking for signs of this fog. There is skepticism regarding the feasibility of detecting such emissions due to their potentially small size and the bright lunar surface. Despite previous attempts to locate water on the Moon yielding no results, the experiment aims to explore new methods of detection.
CosmologyHobbyist
Messages
61
Reaction score
4
I'd like to propose an experiment for finding water on the moon (see third point).

First point, the evidence: Apollo astronauts commented that the crater Aristarchus is the most volcanic-looking region on the moon. If earth, Venus, and Mars have feature volcanic regions (Hawaii, Beta Regio, Olymus Mons) why not the moon? A volcanic region could be emitting volcanic steam. I have heard of unconfirmed cloud sightings in the Aristarchus region. Volcanic steam would contain salts dissasociated into free sodium and free chlorine. The chlorine quickly disapates into space, leaving the moon with an atmosphere of 99% sodium vapour (at 1/10,000 of Earth sea-level air pressure). Where else could a sodium atmosphere come from, since the lunar surface is not hot enough to liquify or gassify sodium? Aristarchus is the whitest region of the moon, could this be from mineral salt deposits?

Second point, the hypothesis: During lunar night, the surface of the moon cools to below freezing point of water. Any steam released from a volcanic vent will freeze to the ground if it touches the lunar surface. Therefore some of any volcanic steam released should become frost during the lunar night. Morning sunlight will evaporate the frost into a temporary fog.

Third point, the experiment: Get a telescope with kilometer, or better yet, 100 meter resolution of the lunar surface and hook up videotape equipment. Wait until the Aristarchus region is moving out of night shadow into day sunlight. Video as sunlight terminator moves across region, watching for fog as frost is vaporised. Several taping sessions may be required to record observable fog banks, if the amount of vented steam is small or intermittant. Perhaps Schroder's Rill, near Aristarchus, is the best place to start looking. Is there anyone I can contact who might want to give this a try?
 
Last edited:
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Finding water on the moon is vital to our ability to establish an outpost. NASA already has a project in the works - the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO) - see:
http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2005/14apr_moonwater.htm
 
Last edited by a moderator:
CosmologyHobbyist said:
I'd like to propose an experiment for finding water on the moon (see third point).

First point, the evidence: Apollo astronauts commented that the crater Aristarchus is the most volcanic-looking region on the moon. If earth, Venus, and Mars have feature volcanic regions (Hawaii, Beta Regio, Olymus Mons) why not the moon? A volcanic region could be emitting volcanic steam. I have heard of unconfirmed cloud sightings in the Aristarchus region. Volcanic steam would contain salts dissasociated into free sodium and free chlorine. The chlorine quickly disapates into space, leaving the moon with an atmosphere of 99% sodium vapour (at 1/10,000 of Earth sea-level air pressure). Where else could a sodium atmosphere come from, since the lunar surface is not hot enough to liquify or gassify sodium? Aristarchus is the whitest region of the moon, could this be from mineral salt deposits?

Second point, the hypothesis: During lunar night, the surface of the moon cools to below freezing point of water. Any steam released from a volcanic vent will freeze to the ground if it touches the lunar surface. Therefore some of any volcanic steam released should become frost during the lunar night. Morning sunlight will evaporate the frost into a temporary fog.

Third point, the experiment: Get a telescope with kilometer, or better yet, 100 meter resolution of the lunar surface and hook up videotape equipment. Wait until the Aristarchus region is moving out of night shadow into day sunlight. Video as sunlight terminator moves across region, watching for fog as frost is vaporised. Several taping sessions may be required to record observable fog banks, if the amount of vented steam is small or intermittant. Perhaps Schroder's Rill, near Aristarchus, is the best place to start looking. Is there anyone I can contact who might want to give this a try?
Anyone with a 10+ inch Newtonian reflector on a motorized mount could probably try it. The bigger the scope, the better the resolution. IIRC an 8 inch, can in good seeing conditions resolve objects the size of the Coliseum. I suspect however this would not be an effective means of detection, since any emission would probably be much smaller than 100 meters, would require extreme magnification, and would probably be washed out by the bright surface. Wouldn't be hard to try though.

edit: From Chronos's link it was tried with a satellite crashed into a crater near the south pole, and nothing was detected. This doesn't mean you couldn't detect it in the manner you suggested, but even assuming the water is there, I wouldn't think it likely.
 
Last edited:
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This hypothesis of scientists about the origin of the mysterious signal WOW seems plausible only on a superficial examination. In fact, such a strong coherent radiation requires a powerful initiating factor, and the hydrogen atoms in the cloud themselves must be in an overexcited state in order to respond instantly. If the density of the initiating radiation is insufficient, then the atoms of the cloud will not receive it at once, some will receive it earlier, and some later. But then there...

Similar threads

Replies
16
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Back
Top