Finding which of two metals in an electrochemical cell reduces

AI Thread Summary
To determine which metal reduces and which oxidizes in an electrochemical cell, consult standard reduction potentials from a General Chemistry textbook. The metal with the more positive standard reduction potential acts as the oxidizing agent and undergoes reduction. Conversely, the metal with the lower standard reduction potential is oxidized. The greater the potential value, the more favorable the reaction is. Understanding these principles is essential for analyzing electrochemical cells effectively.
physicsperson
Messages
20
Reaction score
1
For an electrochemical cell containing two metals how do I figure out which one reduces and which one oxidizes using standard reduction potentials? Thank you very much for the help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
physicsperson said:
For an electrochemical cell containing two metals how do I figure out which one reduces and which one oxidizes using standard reduction potentials? Thank you very much for the help.

Study from a General Chemistry textbook. The principles will be well explained.
 
the species having the more positive standard reduction potential is the oxidizing agent.

the greater the value, the more feasible is the reaction.
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top